How is it Possible for Women to Rule the World? (By William Bond)

By William Bond 

(Originally posted on the Rasa Von Werder blog)

Since the 1980s I have been advocating both matriarchy and that God is a woman. But thinking about it these two concepts are in contradiction with each other. Because if God is female then why are we living in a patriarchal world? Surely a female God would ensure that it’s women who rule the world and not men. We can only understand this contradiction by realising that we are first and foremost spiritual beings. So life on Earth, in our material bodies, is only a small part of our existence. As I have written in my new book, Mother God Hypothesis, the purpose of living our on planet is to learn love. Where women are the teachers and teach men how to love. 

So if the spiritual purpose of women is to teach men how to love. Then surely it would be easier for women to do this if women ruled the world? That’s true, but both men and women also have to be tested to truly know if we understood how to love. So the way to do this, is in a patriarchal society where men have responsibility for ruling the world and see how they will rule when they are in-charge. But when women released the reigns of power and allowed men to rule our world it went badly wrong from the beginning. Scientists using DNA evidence has shown that about 7000 years ago in Europe and the Middle East 95% of all men were killed but not women. It seems that 7000 years ago men fought such savage wars, the majority of men died in this violence. This has been supported also by archaeology where mass graves of men have been discovered by archaeologists, where all the men showed signs of a violent death. 

This was theorised in 1950s and 60s by the archaeologist Marija Gimbutas who claimed that peaceful Goddess cultures were conquered by people she called the Kurgan. At the time this theory was strongly disputed but in more recent times, DNA evidence have supported her theories. Although nowadays they call the Kurgan people the Yamnaya. A good video explaining this is called; Ancient Civilizations: The Goddess vs. The Yamnaya.

So the switch from matriarchy to patriarchy got off to a very bad start. But Mother God is forgiving, tolerant and understanding and so men were allowed to continue to rule. And to their credit they did manage to curb their extreme violence and somehow create societies without murdering each other. Although wars and genocide did continue as well as slavery and the oppression of women. Unfortunately this has been the story of patriarchy ever since. Although it has to be admitted things have slowly changed for the better. For instance, back in Roman times gladiators were forced to fight each other to the death for the sole purpose of entertaining Roman spectators. There is no place on our planet today, where this would be tolerated or accepted. So everything is slowly changing for the better, like we see in the 19th century, where both slavery and serfdom were both abolished. But wars and even genocide are still happening today in the 21st century. 

But patriarchy hasn’t only just been a test of love for men, it also at test for women as well. Teaching love to men in a matriarchal society would have been a lot easier for women, because they would have the status and authority to do this. It is far more difficult for women to do this in any patriarchal society because women would be teaching men love from the position of being a second class citizen. Because of this, many women have found this so difficult that they have ended up being taught by men that; “love is a weakness”. So many women have learnt from men, how not to love and even how to hate. 

In spite of the progress men have made in becoming more loving people compared with what they were like thousands of years ago. There are signs that MotherGod has decided to bring this test to an end we can see this in the rise of feminism. This started back in the 18th century with the book; “A Vindication of the Rights of Woman” by Mary Wollstonecraft. Since then feminism has grown so that in the 20th century, there has been large numbers of countries throughout the word which has given equal rights to women. So will this lead to a matriarchal world? It might happen but at present one of the biggest opponents of matriarchy are feminists. Feminism has been very successful by promoting the concept of sexual equality. So they see matriarchy as being the flip side of patriarchy where women oppress men in much the same way as men have oppressed women. For this reason many feminists oppose matriarchy as strongly as they oppose patriarchy, because matriarchy undermines their argument for sexual equality. 

If that’s the case, how can matriarchy succeed if it’s being opposed by patriarchal men and feminist women? The only community I know who want matriarchy and women to rule the world, is the femdom community but they promote feminists worse fears. They have fantasies of cruel women who use men like abused slaves. So this form of matriarchy wouldn’t work, because the spiritual purpose of women is to teach men how to love. But perhaps we won’t need a matriarchal movement like feminism to bring about matriarchy, it might just happen spontaneously. How this could happen we can see women’s academic performance. I looked this up on the internet and this is what I got. 

Grade Performance: Meta-analyses confirm that girls earn higher grades than boys in all major subjects, including mathematics and science, with the gap being largest in language courses and smallest in STEM fields. 

Educational Attainment: Women began earning more college degrees than men in the mid-1980s and continue to dominate enrollment; in 2018, 57% of students in U.S. degree-granting institutions were female. 

Subject-Specific Nuances: While women generally achieve higher grades, men may still score higher on standardized math and science tests, though recent research indicates negligible gender differences in actual mathematical ability. 

Graduation Rates: Women have higher graduation rates in every U.S. state, with female graduation rates exceeding 70% in 16 states compared to only two states for men.

So it seems that feminist activism in pushing for equality in academia, has resulted in women outperforming men. So in theory this should result in women taking over and ruling our world, but this hasn’t happened yet. The reason is that women have a couple of more hurdles to jump over, to do this. The main one is childbirth. Many career minded women end up having to choose between having a career or having children. This is less of a problem for women from wealthy families as she can hire a nanny to look after her children, but is a big problem for women who can’t afford to do that. As the result, the birth rate in countries where there is sexual equality has dramatically decreased. While in countries and cultures where women are still oppressed by men, so women are not encouraged to have a career, the birth rate still continues to rise. 

The second problem is that too many women now believe what men taught them, that “love is a weakness”. So many feminist women in trying to be equal to men believe that have to act and behave like men to gain power, wealth and status. The result has been that although we have seen an increase in the number of female politicians, all of them are as dishonest, crooked and duplicitous as the average male politician. So for the general public there is no advantage in voting for a female politician because she will probably be as corrupt as a male politician. 

The only way women can progress to matriarchy is to ditch feminism, even though it has served them so well, for more than the last two hundred years. So can feminism accept that men and women are very different? We see this already with trans women row, where biological men have tried to muscle into female sports by claiming they are women. This could have been the death of female sport if some brave sportswomen hadn’t had spoken up. This has resulted in women having to accept that men and women are biologically different, as men’s greater size and strength does give men a decisive advantage in nearly all sports. So if women can accept this, they then can accept how difference men and women are different, in so many other ways. Like we see in women’s academic achievements where women outperform men. Not that this is anything new, it has been written about in the 20th century in books like: The Natural Superiority of Women, by Ashley Montagu; Brain Sex, by Ann Moir and David Jessel and Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus, by John Gray. 

Feminist hated books like this because it undermines their argument that men and women are the same. But science does support everything these authors say about the difference between men and women. Two hundred years ago Mary Wollstonecraft made the argument that men and women are the same because sexist men at that time made claims that men ruled the world because they were more intelligent than women. Or that women were,”too emotional” to makes sensible decisions. (“Sensible” decisions like starting wars). But feminists have already won Mary Wollstonecraft’s argument for her. Academic women have proven that men are not more intelligent than women and are able to make sensible decisions. Very few men, (outside of Islam) would today dare publicly claim that men are more intelligent than women, like they did in the 18th and 19th centuries. So matriarchy is not as big a threat to women’s empowerment, as feminist believe it to be. 

So it should be possible to have a matriarchal political party which claims that it women would make better rulers than men if they act and behave like women and not try to imitate men. So women in a matriarchal party should make it clear that women have maternal and nurturing instincts and it’s natural for women to love and care for others. So they will follow their strongest instincts and care about the people they rule. Which means they will be not be corrupt and so won’t accept bribes from billionaires, large corporations or anyone else. But doing this they will demonstrate that love is a strength and not a weakness. 

The point is that the public are fed up with lying and corrupt politicians and will vote for any politician who tells the truth and does what she says she will do. So straight away we can see that a matriarchal party of real women who do follow their maternal instincts have a big advantage. It has been shown that a political platform like this can work. Jacinda Ardern used it to became Prime Minster of New Zealand. But as it turned out she proved to be a normal lying and corrupt politician who had no intention of keeping her election promises. So she quickly became very unpopular and was forced to resign. So this means that any Matriarchal political party not only has to tell the public they are caring and loving women, they have to put it into practise and keep their promises. When they get into power. Or they to will be vote out of power in the next election. Also, once there is one successful matriarchal government somewhere in the world. It will encourage people of other countries to try to do the same thing. 

It is well known that corruption is the main cause of decline of any country. For instance in China they are so frightened of corruption, that they have executed government officials who accept bribes. It is the main reason why the western countries are declining. Back in the early 1980s the Regan government proposed the idea of “deregulation”, claiming that too much regulation was hampering business dealings. Other western countries also adopted the same idea. What was not explained was that these regulations were there to try to prevent corruption. So when the regulations  were abolished, corruption in all Western countries went unchecked. So the Chinese economy who is doing it’s best to limit corruption is growing, while Western countries where corruption is rampant, is declining. This means that a matriarchal government who is serious about caring for the people and won’t accept bribes from anyone, will prosper and give their people a better standard of living. So once a matriarchal government gets into power, providing the women follow their maternal instincts, they will continue to rule as long as they like. 

Amazon.com

Blog

My Matriarchal Journey (By William Bond)

By William Bond 

(Originally posted on the Rasa Von Werder blog)

Back at the end of the 1980s I wrote a book with the help of my friend Pamela Suffield a book called “Gospel of the Goddess”. We wrote as a New Age book but soon found out most New Agers were not interested in it. Not even women into Goddess spirituality. The only people who liked our book was the Femdom community who then contacted us. Pamela soon lost interest in this but I continued to communicate with them, but soon discovered a problem. 

In our book “Gospel of the Goddess” we not only claimed that God was a women we also suggested that women should rule the world. Which is what the femdom community liked. But we claimed that the reason why women should rule the world, is that women are far more caring and loving people than men. This was totally different to femdom fantasies which wanted women to not only be the dominant sex but to be cruel and sadistic as well. So I had problems with dealing with that. But because I kept in communication with the femdom community “Gospel of the Goddess” did get published in New York by Artemis Creations Publishing. Although it didn’t sell very well. 

I then got in contact with a women who called herself Goddess Dianna Vesta and I got on well with her. She encouraged me to go onto the internet and to me she came across to me as a very nice person yet she was pedaling Femdom fantasies, where women were very cruel to men. Then I came in contact with Rasa Von Werder and she was willing to promote my ideas about matriarchy and why God is a woman but she had no interest in femdom which made things a lot easier for me. At about the same time Dianna Vesta dropped out. So I continued working with Rasa Von Werder but I still found the biggest support for matriarchy and the idea that God is a woman, still came from the femdom community. 

But the problem both Rasa and I had was that in selling the concept that women should rule the world, because they are kinder people than men, didn’t fit in with the behaviour of female politicians. If we look at well known female politicians like Indira Gandhi, Margaret Thatcher, Angela Merkel and Hillary Clinton none of them demonstrated the caring and loving side of women. All of them proved to be as ruthless, corrupt and deceptive as any normal male politicians. The main reason for this is that women are told that, “love is a weakness”. So ambitious women are encouraged to suppress any maternal or nurturing instincts they have, if they want to succeed in the brutal world of patriarchal politics. 

The second problem we both had was that there was another matriarchal group called Matriarchal Studies. This was a academic matriarchal group that although believed in matriarchy they claimed that matriarchy was all about sexual equality. It wasn’t about women ruling the world. As the result when Rasa attempted to contact these women she was strongly rejected. But it seems to me that their form of matriarchy is not matriarchy but feminism. I would agree that a community ruled by women is far more likely to be more equal than any patriarchal society. But surely matriarchal is in the end, female rule. If we had a egalitarian society ruled both by men and women, men would compete against women for power and women would in the end have to act and behave like male politicians or lose power. Which is the situation we have today, where female politicians have to suppress any loving feelings they have, if they want political power.

A third problem we had, was that the only argument we has for claiming that God was a woman was that Jesus claimed that God is a God of love. So it would then make far more sense that a loving God would be female rather than male. The big problem with that, is that as atheists point out that; “if God is a God of love then, then why do we live in a world of suffering?” Which is a difficult problem to answer, not only for us, but for all Christians. 

Then a couple of years ago I read about the ancient Greek legend of how the Greek Goddess Gaia come into being when she emerged out of chaos. At first I just saw this as just an alternative explanation to how the universe began, but the more I thought about it I began to realise that it explained so much more. At it explains why God is female and why a loving God would create a world of suffering like we now live in. You  can read a full explanation of this in my book; Mother God Hypothesis. Or in my previous article.

From this I learnt that men are here on this planet to learn how to love and women are their teachers. But unfortunately men also teach women to reject love as they claim it’s a weakness and even teach women how to hate. This then is why we need a religion the explains why God is female and why we need to live in a matriarchal society. So men can learn to except that women are their teachers in teaching them how to love and stop them from teaching women the opposite to this.

Amazon.com

Blog

Why God Is A Woman (By William Bond)

By William Bond 

(Originally posted on the Rasa Von Werder blog)

For anyone who asks questions like; “why are we here?”, or “what is the purpose and meaning of life?” Then the whole world is a mystery. It’s even more of a problem if you’re also interested in cosmology, because then you also ask; “where do we come from?” which is also a very difficult question. This question has occupied the minds of philosophers throughout history and no one can give a undisputed answer to this question. 

In the past there was two answers to this question. Many religions claimed that, a God created the world. But that is disputed by atheists and secularists who then ask; “who or what created God?” and religions have no answer to this question. But atheists or secularists didn’t have a satisfactory answer to how the world was created either. All they could do was claim the world is eternal, so it never had a beginning. Which is a mind boggling concept. But then at the beginning of the 20th century scientists came up with a much better and more acceptable way our universe was created, in what came to be known as the Big Bang Theory. 

As 20th century technology began to produce bigger and better telescopes, astronomers began to obtain a clearer understanding of the size and nature of the whole universe. And through this they began to notice that galaxies seem to be flying apart from each other. So some astronomers, like Edwin Hubble then asked the question, “what would happen if we go back in time when these galaxies were closer together?”. From this came the calculation that 13.8 billion years ago the whole universe was a single clump of matter. From this came the Big Bang Theory which claimed the whole universe exploded out of nothing. 

How a universe was able to explode out of nothing is never satisfactory explained, but for many people it is a far better explanation than any idea that a God created the universe, or that we live in an eternal universe. But it is claimed that; science is indifferent to any personal bias or anything we wish to believe. So although the foundation of the Big Bang Theory is built on science, but then science then began to dismantle and destroy this theory through what is known as the fine-tuned universe hypothesis. 

In 1961, the physicist Robert H. Dicke pointed out that gravity and electromagnetism, must be perfectly fine-tuned for life to exist in the universe. Then astronomer Fred Hoyle took this concept even further and in his 1983 book, “The Intelligent Universe”. Where he pointed out many other ways our universe is fine-tuned. Unfortunately most of the general public is unaware of this because you need to be a scientist to properly understand the fine-tuned universe hypothesis. For instant there is the Cosmological Constant. Which is the energy density of the vacuum which must balance with extraordinary precision. If it was to differed by just one part in 10^50, the universe would either expand too fast for galaxies to form, or it would collapse catastrophically. (10^50 is 10 with 50 zeros. A trillion has only 12 zeros, so 10^50 is an extremely higher number.)

The main forces known to science is gravity, electromagnetism, the strong Nuclear Force and the weak Nuclear Force. Again it was discovered that all these forces are so finely balanced that if any of these forces was not exactly right, then atoms could not be created. So the fundamental building blocks of matter could not exist without all these forces being so finely tuned. This then undermined the Big Bang Theory because how did universe became so finely tuned when it exploded out of nothing? The Noble prize physicist Sir Roger Penrose calculated that this would be so unlikely that it is 1 in 10^10^123 for us to live in the stable universe we live in. This is a number so high that it is even much more than the estimated number of atoms in the observable universe. It would be even more unlikely if you created a huge explosion inside a rock formation and the debris from the explosion came down and formed into a circle of perfectly formed houses made of stone. But the Big Bang Theory is also coming under attack from the findings of the new James Webb space telescope. Because what this telescope is discovering about our universe, does not fit with the claims and calculations of the Big Bang Theory. 

The problem is for atheistic and secular scientists is that the fine-tuned universe hypothesis seem to strongly suggest that a great intelligence created our world. This seems to prove that a God created the world after all. But if that’s true it still doesn’t answer the question, “who or what created God?”

But then many people would claim that this is an unknowable question. But recently I discovered the answer to this question was hidden in ancient myths. I was looking on-line about the ancient Greek Goddess Gaia where I learnt that the Ancient Greeks called her “The Mother of Everything” and she emerged spontaneously from Chaos. She then created all other gods, mortals and the whole world. 

This is very similar to how atheist scientists claimed that life emerged on our planet from something they call; Abiogenesis. Where in primordial soup the right chemicals in the right conditions came together to form the first spark of life. (Although no scientist up until now, has been able to produce life from non-living matter.) There is also the Infinite Monkey Theorem which is a thought experiment by the French mathematician Émile Borel. He claimed monkeys hitting typewriter keys at random would over time write the whole works of Shakespeare. So could this be how Gaia spontaneously emerged from Chaos? 

So it suggests we do live in a infinite universe, but it was at one time a sea of chaos. But in that chaos there would be infinite possibilities. So over infinite time and space there would be a chance formation of energy that would create the first intelligence. But if this is true, then this first intelligence would have to be feminine. The reason for this is that a masculine intelligence would fight and compete against the surrounding chaos. Which would only create more chaos and so a masculine intelligence would end up drowning in the chaos it was fighting against. Whereas a feminine intelligence would do her best to work with the surrounding chaos and try to create order from it. And so by doing this she would become larger and stronger. So it does suggest that in time, it was she that created the stable and orderly universe we now live in. 

This then suggests that the sea of chaos is represented by the masculine because the masculine represents aggression, competition, conflict, fighting, war which finally leads to chaos. Whereas the feminine is all about love, caring, order and nurturing which leads to harmony. So it would be a feminine God that would create the fine-tuned universe. But if that’s the case, why do we have men representing the masculine which leads chaos, living on the same planet as women? Because women represents the feminine which tries to create love, order and harmony around her. The reason might be that a planet of only men, would in time destroy each other in violence and war. So you need women to prevent men from doing this. But women pay a heavy price for trying to save men because they have been abused, assaulted, murdered and oppressed by men throughout history. 

So why would a Female God allow women to come to a planet like ours to be so badly ill treated by men? The answer to this question is that women are spiritual teachers and attempt to teach men how to love. Unfortunately many men resist this, as they think “love in a weakness” not understanding that love in the most powerful force in the universe, because unconditional love unite us all in oneness, which is what God is. So instead men try to teach women that love is weak and even go as far as to teach women how to hate. We even see this is the Christian religion where Jesus tried to teach men how to love, but his teachings are still ignored by many Christians who instead judge and condemn others. 

I would need a book to explain it all, which I have written in my book, “Mother God Hypothesis.”

 

Amazon.com

Blog

Another Great Cute Animal Video!

The Misogyny-Misandry Death Spiral (Re-Post)

With all that has been going on in the world lately, one common thread seems to be noticeable these days.  Scratch the surface of so many problems, and you will often find some flavor of misogyny lurking under the surface.

First, some definitions:

Misogyny:  hatred and/or hostility towards Women and girls

Misandry:  hatred and/or hostility towards men and boys

Misanthropy:  hatred and/or hostility towards humanity in general, regardless of gender

After the 2024 election in the USA, the 4B Movement (of Women to essentially boycott men) began trending stateside online, though it was already several years old by then in the Republic of Korea (South Korea), its birthplace.  Dig a little deeper into exactly why it originated there, of all countries, and you will see that they actually have a pretty massive and systemic misogyny problem over there.  It's often very subtle of course, and the fellas there always seem so nice and friendly to outside observers from the rest of the world, but beware:  a "kinder, gentler patriarchy" is still a patriarchy.  They are basically a traditional society that has rapidly (and unevenly) modernized, and still has a LOT of old patriarchal baggage to unpack.  And just beneath the surface, it is apparently downright horrifying for so many of the Women of South Korea, so much that so many want nothing to do with men at all if they can help it.  And it really shows most starkly of all in their all-time record low birthrates (lowest in the world currently, with a TFR of as low as 0.80-0.90 children per Woman, less than half the replacement of 2.1) which no amount of pronatalism seems to be able to raise.  

Even their utterly dystopian and Stalinist totalitarian neighbor to the north (the DPRK, or North Korea) somehow manages significantly higher rates of procreation than South Korea these days, so that really says something indeed!

Now zoom out to the world as a whole, particularly on the internet and social media.  Misogyny seems to be reactionary, refractory, and recrudescent in recent years all over the world, with the USA being the most recent ground zero for this ugly trend.  And in very recent years, especially online, you will also notice at least in some circles an equal and opposite reaction (i.e. misandry) per Newton's laws of physics, even though it is not systemic like misogyny is.  But it does appear to unwittingly give ammunition to the latter all the same, unfortunately.  And social media only amplifies both hostilities further, and it ultimately spills over into the offline world as well.  Zoom out even further and look at it on a longer time scale as well, and you will clearly see a vicious cycle and downward spiral occur as follows:

Misogyny begets misandry begets misogyny begets misandry begets misogyny begets misandry begets misogyny begets misandry begets misogyny begets misandry begets misogyny, and so on.

It's enough to turn practically anyone into a full-blown, all-around misanthrope!  At least then, you don't actually have to decide which gender you dislike the most.

This phenomenon is what I call the "Misogyny-Misandry Death Spiral", or MMDS for short.  And the MMDS is a negative-sum (lose-lose) game for all. It leads to nothing but tribalism, polarization, balkanization, and toxicity all around. As Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. famously said, "Hate cannot drive out hate.  Only love can do that".

Divide et impera. Divide and rule. Rinse and repeat. While the oligarchs laugh at the "little people" all the way to the bank.

The results of the 2024 election in the USA are in fact both a cause and a consequence of this vicious death spiral, which threatens to destroy the country, and ultimately the world if left unchecked.

Of course, men could very easily end this spiral right now along with the broader gender war if they truly wanted to, by "accepting the unacceptable" and surrendering to Women.  But unfortunately, there is nowhere near a critical mass willing to do so at this time yet.

Reminder: This Blog Will Be Updated Irregularly Going Forward

Just a heads up, dear followers.  Due to current events, going forward, this blog will be updated on a more irregular basis than in the past.  Don't worry, this blog is not going away!  Stay tuned, everyone.

To be continued.......

ICYMI: William Bond's New Book: Mother God Hypothesis (Now Available In Blog Form As Well)

The great author and prophet William Bond's latest book, Mother God Hypothesis, has been published and is now available on Amazon UK and Amazon USA.  It is also now available in blog form as well here: https://mothergodhypothesis.blogspot.com/

To quote the abstract/overview of the book:

Book overview

If God is a God of love, why do we live in a world of suffering?

Atheists say the answer is simple: there is no God. Religious believers struggle to explain it. In The Mother God Hypothesis, William Bond offers a radical third possibility — one that draws on quantum physics, ancient archaeology, comparative mythology, and the fine-tuned universe theory to argue that the true nature of God is female.

Bond traces the evidence for a Great Mother deity back through thousands of years of suppressed history — from the goddess figurines of prehistoric Europe to the sacrificial/saviour gods whose teachings of unconditional love kept reappearing across cultures, only to be distorted by patriarchal rulers. He examines how the Gaia hypothesis, quantum mechanics, and the extraordinary fine-tuning of universal constants all point toward a cosmic intelligence that is nurturing, creative, and maternal.

At the heart of the book is a striking proposition: Earth is a school, designed by the Great Mother, where humanity learns how to love. Women, closer to the Mother's nature, serve as teachers. Men, driven by competition and aggression, are the students. And the suffering we see around us is not evidence of God's absence — but of an education still in progress.

The Mother God Hypothesis challenges both atheist materialism and patriarchal religion, offering a theology built on unconditional love, ancient wisdom, and modern science.

Excellent book overall.  Be sure to check it out!

"Soulshine" by Allman Brothers Band

Rest in Paradise, Guru Rasa Von Werder.  Thinking of you again.  Your soul is certainly shining!

Be A Human, Not A Ghost (And Let The Buyer Beware): Best Dating Advice For 2026 And Beyond

To any and all of the readers here, as a corrective to all the BS on social media lately, here is the best dating (and/or hookup or FWB) advice I can give for 2026 and beyond, from a liberal, progressive, male feminist ally + Matriarchist ally perspective:

Ladies, if a guy says some flavor of that he "doesn't want anything serious right now", BELIEVE HIM the first time!  Regardless of whether he is saying it in good faith or bad faith, or whether the accent is on the "right now" part, you will NOT change his mind, and you certainly won't do so by sleeping with him.  And also, in terms of agency, autonomy, and empowerment, you really cannot have it both ways.  Hiding behind self-denial of agency really does women no favors at all whatsoever.

Also ladies, remember that if you jump in bed with a guy before you even have a label (not that there is anything wrong with that, of course!), don't expect faithfulness and exclusivity to automatically follow.  In fact, NEVER automatically assume that a man is exclusively with you unless he explicitly says so (and even then, "trust but verify", as the old proverb goes).  "Let the buyer beware", in other words.  Natch.

Fellas, remember that honesty is still the best policy regardless, and enthusiastic consent is the FLOOR, not the ceiling.  And of course, do NOT lie, manipulate, fractionate, gaslight, or otherwise deliberately lead women on.  But please do NOT read into this that you should somehow be "cruel to be kind" to women (by having one-sided "smash and dash" or ghosting after sex, for example) so they don't "get the wrong idea" (UGH).  Be a decent human being, not a ghost.  Basic human decency is the bare minimum, after all.  Women are PEOPLE, not objects.  Think "I and Thou", not "I and It", as Martin Buber said.  Always treat humanity (regardless of gender) as an end in itself, never solely as a means to an end, echoing Immanuel Kant.

And remember that "casual" does NOT have to mean "meaningless", "impersonal", "degrading", "one-sided", or anything else besides "no expectation of commitment".

(Consider putting the "friend" back in "friends with benefits", mutually of course.)

Also, fellas, if you are feeling lonely, unloved, frustrated, "friendzoned", or any variation thereof, STOP simping for "Stacy", and give "Becky" a chance.  Get yourself out there, work on yourself, and stop feeling sorry for yourself!  And for the love of all that is good, jettison the word "inc*l" from your vocabulary at once, and quit all such adjacent groups and forums cold turkey, and don't look back!  That word a self-fulfilling and self-defeating prophecy that literally NEVER ends well at all.

You're better than that!

And finally, for both primary genders (and otherwise), remember that if you cannot even be honest with yourself, how can you possibly be honest with each other?

Otherwise, you do you, live and let live.  Peace ✌️

(There, I literally just saved everyone thousands of dollars worth of therapy, lots of wasted time and energy, or much, much worse.  You're very welcome 😊)

William Bond's New Book: Mother God Hypothesis

The great author and prophet William Bond's latest book, Mother God Hypothesis, has been published and is now available on Amazon UK and Amazon USA. To quote:

Book overview

If God is a God of love, why do we live in a world of suffering?

Atheists say the answer is simple: there is no God. Religious believers struggle to explain it. In The Mother God Hypothesis, William Bond offers a radical third possibility — one that draws on quantum physics, ancient archaeology, comparative mythology, and the fine-tuned universe theory to argue that the true nature of God is female.

Bond traces the evidence for a Great Mother deity back through thousands of years of suppressed history — from the goddess figurines of prehistoric Europe to the sacrificial/saviour gods whose teachings of unconditional love kept reappearing across cultures, only to be distorted by patriarchal rulers. He examines how the Gaia hypothesis, quantum mechanics, and the extraordinary fine-tuning of universal constants all point toward a cosmic intelligence that is nurturing, creative, and maternal.

At the heart of the book is a striking proposition: Earth is a school, designed by the Great Mother, where humanity learns how to love. Women, closer to the Mother's nature, serve as teachers. Men, driven by competition and aggression, are the students. And the suffering we see around us is not evidence of God's absence — but of an education still in progress.

The Mother God Hypothesis challenges both atheist materialism and patriarchal religion, offering a theology built on unconditional love, ancient wisdom, and modern science.

Excellent book overall.  Be sure to check it out!

UPDATE:  William's new book is now available in blog form as well, at the following blog site:  https://mothergodhypothesis.blogspot.com/

ICYMI, Don't Forget Rasa's YouTube Channel!

ICYMI, don't forget to check out the late, great Guru Rasa Von Werder's YouTube Channel.  It recently got a new name, but is the same great channel.  And be sure to SHARE the videos far and wide!

https://youtube.com/@gururasavonwerder?si=ZoEcoL7L2Hp7aFP5

Enjoy 😊 

Why Do Cold-Blooded Psychopaths Rule Our World? (Updated 2026 Re-Post)

By Ajax the Great (Pete Jackson), William Bond, and the late, great Guru Rasa Von Werder (RIP).

(Originally posted on the Vive La Difference! blog back in 2019, which in turn was adapted from an Embodiment of God article from 2014 by Rasa and William.)

It seems that these days, and indeed for as long as anyone can remember, psychopaths and sociopaths (the former are born, the latter are made) have long been grossly overrepresented in positions of power.  The higher the echelons of the power hierarchy, the greater prevalence of psychopaths/sociopaths there are.  And it seems to have only gotten that much worse in recent decades in fact, and more global as well.  Thus, this applies a fortiori and is more relevant than ever now.

(Garden-variety psychopath, knife optional)

So why is that?  The answer, it seems, is patriarchy.  The following article from 2014 is a conversation between the legendary Guru Rasa Von Werder and great author William Bond, originally published on Rasa's Embodiment of God website. (My interspersed comments, as Ajax the Great, are in red.)

PSYCHOPATH PATRIARCHAL LEADERS by William Bond…..comments Rasa Von Werder….. 4 30 14

If we want to understand why we live in a world of conflict — wars, violence, abuse, poverty and suffering, then we have to go back to basics.  What is undisputed is that men rule our world and have done so for thousands of years.  Male-rule is what feminists call patriarchy – masculine rule – and masculinity (as defined in our present society) is aggression, force, violence and intimidation.

AJAX THE GREAT: Absolutely true indeed.  Truer words were never spoken.

RASA:  LET ME JUST ADD HERE THAT ALL THE STATISTICS – EDUCATIONAL AND EMPLOYMENT WISE, ARE POINTING TO WOMEN RISING, MEN FALLING BEHIND. THE FUTURE IS WOMEN, IT IS MATRIARCHY. HOLD ON, KEEP PRAYING AND BELIEVING, WOMEN WILL RULE THE WORLD, MEN WILL FALL. THEY ARE GOING EXTINCT. THEIR OWN ACTIONS HAVE BROUGHT DEATH UPON THEM.

AJAX SAYS:  Indeed, Women are rising, while men are falling away and falling apart, and have been so for a while now.

RASA SAYS:  THIS BEGS, FOR ME, A NEW DEFINITION OF “MASCULINE.”  I POSIT AS A MASCULINE MAN, FOR INSTANCE, SAINT REV. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR.  THERE WAS A REAL MAN, WHO RISKED HIS LIFE TO SAVE OTHERS, AND GAVE HIS LIFE AS JESUS DID.  I READ HIS BOOK “THE STRENGTH TO LOVE,” WHICH WAS ABOUT LOVING THOSE IN SPITE OF THE FACT THEY BOMB YOUR HOUSE.  HE KNEW THE MEANING OF LOVE, HE WAS STRONG.  THAT’S A REAL MAN, OR A REAL WOMAN.  BULLIES ARE NOT REAL MEN, THEY ARE COWARDS, THEY ARE WEAK, CRUEL, AND THEY WILL BE REMOVED AWAY LIKE “THE CHAFF WHICH THE WIND BLOWETH AWAY”.  THEY ARE ALL BLUFF AND BLUSTER, BUT IN ETERNAL LIFE, THEY HAVE NO SUBSTANCE EXCEPT BURNING IN HELL.

AJAX SAYS:  Indeed, bullies have what is now known as "toxic masculinity", which is detrimental to everyone, and they are also cowards.  They are certainly not real men!

We can see this in the way male animals behave in the rutting season.  Every spring animals like bulls, rams and stags fight each other for dominance and access to females.  In these fights the winner takes all, the biggest and strongest males gain access to all females, while the weaker ones get zero.  A successful stag is not only bigger and stronger, but aggressive, ruthless and selfish.  Sharing with other stags is not an option; there can be only one winner who takes everything for himself.

RASA SAYS:  YES, INDEED, GOOD ANALOGY.  HOWEVER, I TAKE NOTE THAT ANIMALS KILL BY THEIR INSTINCT, TAKE HAREMS THROUGH VIOLENCE, BUT THERE IT ENDS.  HUMAN MALES ARE NOT ANIMALISTIC, BUT “SUBHUMAN,” AS THEY NOT ONLY FOLLOW INSTINCTS BUT THEY ARE SENSELESSLY SADISTIC.  ANIMALS DO NOT RAPE TINY ONE DAY OLD BABIES (AND MANY ARE KILLED) OR SMALL INFANTS….THEY DO NOT PLAN MURDER, THEY DO NOT DO “GENOCIDES.”  THEY DO NOT, IN ORDER TO GAIN PLUNDER, WIPE OUT THOUSANDS OR HOPE TO MURDER MILLIONS.  THEY DO NOT USE THEIR MINDS TO CREATE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION SUCH AS ATOM BOMBS, INVENTION OF AIDS PUT SECRETLY INTO VACCINES; THEY DO NOT PLAN TO MICROCHIP MILLIONS AND USE THEM AS SLAVES, THEY DO NOT CREATE CONCENTRATION CAMPS WITH OVENS READY TO EVAPORATE PEOPLE AT 2,500 DEGREES.  THEY DO NOT SKIN OTHER ANIMALS ALIVE TO GET PAID FOR THEIR PELTS.  THEY DO NOT PLAN FRANKENSTEIN CROPS LIKE GMO’S NOR DO THEY PLAN TO MAKE HEALTHY FOODS ILLEGAL.  HUMAN MALES HAVE TAKEN THIS INSTINCT TO THE POINT OF DEMONIC SUCH AS HAS NEVER EXISTED – THAT IS WHY MOTHER GOD IS RENDERING HUMAN MALES EXTINCT.

AJAX SAYS:  Very well-said, Rasa.  Indeed, sub-human or demonic is the best way to describe such evil and sadistic behavior that goes way, way beyond natural instincts.  And even many of those who are not so extreme are still willing to lie, cheat, steal, and even kill for filthy lucre.

We see the same in patriarchal societies.  The vast majority of the wealth and power of any country is possessed by a small minority of people.  Like rutting stags, the winner takes all, while the losers, the poor, get “the crumbs from the rich man’s table”.  Men, also like stags, are violent, because the boundaries of any country are decided by war.  For this reason, all countries have to have a strong military against invasion.

AJAX SAYS:  There are in fact more than enough resources in the world for everyone on this planet to have a decent standard of living, yet poverty and extreme inequality remain.  Why?  Patriarchy features winner-take-all economics, and reverse Robin Hood economics.  Rob from the poor, give to the rich, and torpedo what's left of the middle class until there are only two classes left:  master, and serf.  And plenty of violence and war, which enriches the oligarchs.

In contrast, as the late great Buckminster Fuller once noted, the feminine paradigm of leadership would reject men's outdated, inane, and insane self-fulfilling prophecy that war and scarcity are somehow inevitable.

Until then, mechaninzation is no match for the Machiavellian machinations of the moneyed elites--most of them MEN.

RASA:  IT IS A PATTERN.  UNTIL AND UNLESS WOMEN TAKE OVER COMPLETELY THIS WILL GO ON AS IF BUT HALF THE WORLD IS PATRIARCHAL, THE OTHER HALF HAS TO HAVE ARMIES TO PROTECT THEMSELVES FROM THEIR VIOLENCE.

AJAX SAYS:  Very true.  Certainly, abolishing the military entirely would be very naive and foolish so long as other countries remain patriarchal and maintain their own militaries.  Though in the USA, we can certainly downsize by cutting our "defense" spending in half and we would still have the strongest fighting force in the world.  Because currently it is not used so much for defense, as it is wars of aggression for plunder and empire, to enrich the psychopathic oligarchs at the top.  See "War Is A Racket" by Major General Smedley Butler, truly a must-read for everyone. 

In any patriarchal society – where men dominate – we have the rule of force, aggression and violence.  If “masculine” people rule our world, then off course it is going to be a brutal where “might is right”. If we want a loving, caring world, then the only way to achieve this is to be ruled by loving and nurturing women.
The abuse of women and children is going to happen because they are smaller and weaker than fully grown men. Men use can use their greater size and strength to get what they want from smaller and weaker people.  The psychiatrist Sigmund Freud hinted at this in his Oedipus complex theory, where the son wants to kill his own father, and possess his mother.  The actual reason for this is probably that the son was being abused by the father and hates him.  He also wants to protect his mother from abuse by the father, but Freud wasn’t allowed to say this.  The tragedy of this is that the son, when he grows up, is likely to treat his own wife and children in exactly the same way.
Freud did write a paper on the physical and sexual abuse children suffered by their fathers and other male relations, but this paper was censored.  To save his career, Freud no longer posited the theories but only hinted at them.  Since then, things have changed with the rise of feminism.  Women are now able to assert themselves and take more control over the children.  As the result, men who beat their wives and physically/sexually abuse their children can now be sent to prison.  As women gained power, children were protected from male abuse.

RASA SAYS:  EXCELLENT POINT.  UNTIL WOMEN ARE EMPOWERED, THEY ARE LIMITED AS TO WHAT THEY CAN DO.  WHEN WOMEN GO TO THE JUDICIAL JUSTICE SYSTEM, IT IS POLITICIZED AGAINST THEM, IN FAVOR OF MEN.  I HAVE BEEN THEIR VICTIM.  WHEN A WOMAN IS RAPED, THEY BLAME THE WOMAN.  WHEN A CHILD IS RAPED, THEY REALLY DON’T CARE.  IF ALL THE MEN WHO RAPE WOMEN AND CHILDREN WERE PUT INTO PRISON, PROBABLY HALF OF ALL MALES WOULD BE INCARCERATED.  MALES STICK UP FOR OTHER MALES.  THE MALE POLICE PERSUADE WOMEN TO DROP CHARGES.  MALE DA’S WON’T PROSECUTE CRIMINALS FOR INJURING OR RAPING WOMEN – IT HAPPENED TO ME TWICE.  THIS IS CHANGING, BUT IT STILL EXISTS.  IN MANY COUNTRIES, WOMEN HAVE NO RIGHTS.  THEY ARE SLAVES AND THEY ARE SAVAGED.  LOOK AT THE THEOCRATIC MUSLIM COUNTRIES.
OBVIOUSLY, ALL THE STATISTICS PROVE WOMEN ARE RISING, MEN ARE FALLING.  BUT IT IS THE WESTERN WOMEN THAT ARE RISING, AND THEY WILL HAVE TO PICK UP THE REST OF THE WOMEN IN OPPRESSED COUNTRIES.  IT WILL TAKE TIME.  WE WILL DO IT.

AJAX SAYS:  Indeed, having male leaders in charge of prosecuting male violence against Women and children, is like the fox guarding the henhouse.  The "good ol' boy" network is all too real, as is the victim-blaming mentality.  Things are slowly but surely improving in that regard, with significant declines in rape, domestic violence, and child abuse statistics since the early 1990s, but we still have a very long way to go before we are anywhere close to a truly "civilized" society.  Women really need to take over.  Yesterday.

The more males dominate a country, the more violent it becomes, as women, children and other men suffer violence, rape and abuse. In such a brutal world we end up with psychopaths running everything, as they are the most vicious and brutal.
An example of this would be Saddam Hussein, who ruled Iraq from 1979 to 2003.  He became the leader as being a psychopath and had no qualms about killing or torturing people.  In the eyes of many this made him a strong leader.  In fact, people now claim that the people of Iraq suffer more from violence, since he was deposed by the USA, than while he was in power.  This is because without a strong brutal leader, in this extreme patriarchal county, law and order has broken down.  The whole of history is full of leaders like this, who take power and hold on to it, through violence and brutality.
Unfortunately, psychopaths not only exist in extreme patriarchal countries but in more moderate, democratic countries.  In their book, “Snakes in Suits: When Psychopaths Go to Work”, by Paul Babiak, Ph.D., and Robert Hare, Ph.D.  They point that in business, psychopaths are far more likely to be successful.  The reason is that they have the ‘right’ qualities to succeed in a male dominated world.  To quote. –
“Several abilities – skills, actually – make it difficult to see psychopaths for who they are. First, they are motivated to, and have a talent for, ‘reading people’ and for sizing them up quickly. They identify a person’s likes and dislikes, motives, needs, weak spots, and vulnerabilities… Second, many psychopaths come across as having excellent oral communication skills. In many cases, these skills are more apparent than real because of their readiness to jump right into a conversation without the social inhibitions that hamper most people… Third, they are masters of impression management; their insight into the psyche of others combined with a superficial – but convincing – verbal fluency allows them to change their situation skillfully as it suits the situation and their game plan.”
This doesn’t only apply to businessmen; you only have to look at successful politicians to see the same thing.  A politician in a patriarchal system has to be able to appear on TV and tell lies without any hint of shame or embarrassment.  This means that being a psychopath is a big advantage in patriarchal politics.
Men off course invent all sorts of excuses to justify why we live in a world of injustice and violence.  Patriarchal religions like to blame the Devil for all the harm men do.  The big problem with this idea is that if God has created everything, then he made the Devil as well.  So why would God make a person like the Devil, who opposes him?  Religion also tries to blame women as well, in spite of the fact women are far less violent and far more caring than men.

RASA SAYS:  MY OPINION OF THE DEVIL AND SATAN IS THE ORIGIN IS MEN, IT COMES FROM THEIR PSYCHE, THEIR ID.  THEY HAVE UNLEASHED THE MILLIONS OR BILLIONS OF DEMONS ON THIS PLANET.  IT COMES FROM THEIR LOWER CHAKRAS AND INSTINCTS.  BUT THEY ARE WORSE THAN ANIMALS, THEY ARE SUBHUMAN, AS I ALREADY SAID.  IT IS NOT ALIENS, IT’S HUMAN MEN.  IF IT WAS ALIENS, WOMEN MIGHT BE AFFECTED – BUT THEY ARE NOT.  WHY ONLY MEN?  THE ALIENS ARE THE FALL GUY, THE EXCUSE, THEY ALWAYS HAVE AN EXCUSE.  THEY TRY TO USE ANIMALS AS EXCUSES, THAT WE ARE VIOLENT AS THEY ARE.  BUT OUR CLOSEST COUSINS ARE THE BONOBOS.

AJAX SAYS:  That makes sense.  According to Paul Levy and Jack D. Forbes, it is the "wetiko" mind-virus, the parasite of the mind and cancer of the soul.  Essentially the same thing as Satan and demons.

CONSIDER THAT, WILLIAM BOND.  INDEED THERE ARE BULLS AND STAGS.  BUT OUR GENEOLOGY IS CLOSEST TO BONOBOS.  THEY ARE MATRIARCHAL, THEY ARE HORNY, FRIENDLY, THEY SOLVE ALL CONFLICTS BY TOUCHING AND FEELING.  THE MOTHERS RULE THE FAMILY AND SOCIETY, AND THEY ARE STRONG, AND THEY POSTURE, BUT THERE IS NO WAR.  WHEN MALES INTIMIDATE FEMALES, THEY ARE MOBBED AND PREVENTED BY SEVERAL FEMALES, THEY CANNOT DOMINATE.

AJAX SAYS:  Indeed, "make love, not war" is essentially how the bonobos live.  That, and like the Robin Morgan quote, "sisterhood is powerful".  We can really learn a lot from them.

Science tries to justify men’s selfishness and violence onto “evolution”.  They claim that the violence of male animals is “survival of the fittest”; where the strongest and fittest males get to breed the next generation of animals.  They totally ignore the female’s role in evolution.  The fact is that the mother gives birth and cares for the young, and this is a far more important role in the survival of any species, than what males do.

RASA SAYS:  WHAT A BRILLIANT POINT WILLIAM HAS MADE, THAT EVOLUTION IS NOT JUST ABOUT MEN, AS MEN WANT US TO BELIEVE.  THE BEHAVIOR OF THE FEMALE WITH HER OFFSPRING IS MORE IMPORTANT!

AJAX SAYS:  Brilliant indeed, as usual, William!  You really hit the proverbial nail on the head.  Even Darwin himself was apparently not a Social Darwinist at all.
 
Conspiracy theories try to blame secret societies like the Freemasons, the Illuminati or even alien reptiles for the ills of our world.  The rich tend to blame the poor and the poor blame the rich, but few people will acknowledge the fact that as it is men who are ruling our world, then the problem must be male rulers.

RASA SAYS:  ABSOLUTE LOGIC, ONCE AGAIN, OF WILLIAM BOND.

AJAX SAYS:  BINGO.  Psychopaths/sociopaths are completely ruthless since they have no conscience, and since the patriarchal paradigm rewards ruthlessness and aggression, then psychopaths/sociopaths will be the ones who inevitably rise to the top under male rule.

It must be obvious that any system that puts psychopaths in leadership positions is a bad arrangement.  Yet, this is what patriarchy does all the time.  Men are naturally aggressive and competitive, and this is not a real problem if they are kept under control.  Unfortunately, when men rule our world the most violent, aggressive or devious men end up in positions of power.

RASA SAYS:  SURE, IF WILLIAM BOND OR JESUS CHRIST RULED OUR SOCIETY WE’D HAVE A PEACEFUL AND LOVING WORLD.

AJAX SAYS:  True.  And Ajax the Great as well.

Patriarchy also breeds psychopaths.  It has been discovered that many psychopaths had appalling childhoods.  A case in point would be Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin and Saddam Hussein – all of whom were beaten mercilessly as children.  Extreme patriarchal cultures encourage this, as they claim that abuse, “toughens up” boys and turns them into ‘real men’.  Certainly turning a man into a psychopath makes him a good soldier, as he can kill without mercy.  A more ordinary man is not such a good soldier, as he has qualms about killing the ‘enemy.’

AJAX SAYS:  So very true, William!  And you can add Pol Pot to that list (by his ruthless teachers) as well.  It seems that "beating the devil out of 'em" is really more like beating the devil INTO 'em, which is what the sinister agenda of the demonic patriarchy really wants to do to turn boys, and thus men, into cannon fodder and "Good Germans" at best, and subhuman demonic zombie killers at worst, to do the bidding of the psychopathic oligarchs at the top. 

RASA SAYS:  GOOD POINT.  BEING BRUTAL AND VIOLENT TOWARD MEN MAKES THEM SO, AND THEREFORE, OUR WORLD ENCOURAGES VIOLENCE THROUGH ALL MEDIA; GLORIFIES IT.  THEY HAVE EXCUSES FOR THIS AS “ENTERTAINMENT,” AND “FREEDOM OF SPEECH,” BUT IT’S MORE THAN THAT.  THEY WANT TO BREED DEMONS – MEN WITH NO FEELINGS WHO KILL WITHOUT MERCY.

If we do not want to be ruled by psychopaths then the obvious solution is for women to rule our world.    It is known that psychopaths can be created by extreme abuse, and in a patriarchal society where women are physically smaller and weaker than the average male, they are far more likely to suffer abuse of all kinds.  Yet, in-spite of this, there are still far less female psychopaths then male.

RASA SAYS:  ANOTHER GOOD POINT THAT I FIRST HEARD FROM WILLIAM BOND.  THE SAME ABUSE/VIOLENCE ON WOMEN DOES NOT ENGENDER THE SAME REACTION FROM WOMEN AS IT DOES MEN.  IT’S THE DIFFERENCE IN THE BRAIN, THE INSTINCT.  WOMEN HAVE A STRONGER INSTINCT TO GIVE LIFE, MEN LESS SO; THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO BE THE PROTECTORS SO THEY HAVE MORE VIOLENT TENDENCIES; BUT THESE MUST BE TEMPERED AND GUIDED RIGHTLY, NOT RUN AMUCK.

AJAX SAYS:  I am not sure how much of this is nature versus nurture, but I would hazard a guess that it is a mixture of both.  Genetics loads the gun, environment pulls the trigger.

So it makes sense for us to be ruled by caring and nurturing females rather than aggressive males.  We can see all over the world the more women are oppressed the more violent societies become.  But in countries where women are empowered society is peaceful.  When women are powerful, everyone benefits – bear in mind how brutal men are to other males.  Abusive fathers appear in elite families as well as poor – men such as Stalin, Hitler and Saddam were brutalized.
The only way to overcome all these problems is to have women take over.  It is true, there are caring men, but the psychos rise to the top — What psychopaths do is take acting lessons in how to appear loving and caring, then they are elected.

AJAX SAYS:  So true.  For thousands of years, the "good guys" have proven wholly incapable of defeating the bad guys on their own.  If us fellas could do it, we would have already done it long ago.  Even when a particularly notorious mass-murdering genocidal dictator like Hitler was defeated, that was achieved with the help of another, equally evil dictator, Stalin, who only gained strength afterwards and subsequently turned against the Allies after we no longer had a common enemy in the Nazis.  Only Women can truly defeat all of the bad guys for good.

RASA SAYS:  YOU CAN SEE LIARS ON TOP OF ALL GOVERNMENTS PRETENDING TO BE HELPING PEOPLE, AND THE PEOPLE BELIEVE THEIR LIES.  IT HAS HAPPENED NUMEROUS TIMES IN HISTORIES.  TAKE KIND HEROD TELLING THE MAGI TO LET HIM KNOW WHERE JESUS IS BORN SO HE TOO, CAN GO WORSHIP HIM.  THEN HEROD SENDS OUT HIS SOLDIERS TO KILL ALL THE BOYS UNDER THE AGE OF TWO.  HE EVEN DUPED THE WOMEN TO BRING THE CHILDREN TO HIS HEADQUARTERS SO THEY COULD BE FETED – THEY BROUGHT THEM ALL DECKED OUT IN GARLANDS OF FLOWERS, WHERE THE SOLDIERS STABBED AND SPEARED THEM TO DEATH.  AND WHAT HAPPENED TO HEROD AND ALL THESE MALE LEADERS WHO KILL SO MANY PEOPLE?  THEY GET WHAT THEY DESERVE EVENTUALLY BUT USUALLY ON EARTH, THEY, LIKE THE GODFATHER, DIE OF OLD AGE.  BUT THE INNOCENT ARE KILLED.  SO MUCH FOR JUSTICE ON EARTH, CERTAINLY DOESN’T EXIST IN A PATRIARCHAL WORLD.

AJAX SAYS:  They give with one hand, and they take with the other.  And they take plenty of lives in the process.

Yes, there are ruthless and deceiving women as well, but not in the same numbers as men.  Women have a powerful maternal instinct and once this instinct is activated then she not only wants to love and care for children of her own, she has the same desire to care for other people’s children, to look after the sick, old people and animals.  If we look at violence, we find that men commit over 99% of all acts of violence.  The reason is that because as women bring life to our world and want to nurture it, so it is harder for women to be cruel and uncaring for others than with men.
The competitive and aggressive instincts of men make them totally unsuitable to rule our world; they instigate conflict, war and injustice.  The maternal/ nurturing instincts of women enable them to run the family and the world – A world ruled by women would be fair, loving and caring.
by William Bond…..comments Rasa Von Werder….. 4 30 14

RASA SAYS:  LET ME JUST ADD HERE THAT ALL THE STATISTICS – EDUCATIONAL AND EMPLOYMENT WISE, ARE POINTING TO WOMEN RISING, MEN FALLING BEHIND.  THE FUTURE IS WOMEN, IT IS MATRIARCHY.  HOLD ON, KEEP PRAYING AND BELIEVING, WOMEN WILL RULE THE WORLD, MEN WILL FALL.  THEY ARE GOING EXTINCT.  THEIR OWN ACTIONS HAVE BROUGHT DEATH UPON THEM.

FINAL THOUGHTS:  Can I get an AMEN?  So very true indeed.  We are all ruled by an oligarchy of a few hundred to a few thousand cold-blooded psychopaths and sociopaths at the top.  And that is the logical conclusion of patriarchy, basically.  Worse, even if they are deposed, these evil villainaire rulers will ultimately return if we don't stamp out the conditions that cause such evil to rise to power in the first place.  Thus the better half of humanity, Women, must rise up and take over once and for all, Goddess willing.  Only then will there ever be true peace on Earth.

What better time than now?

2024 UPDATE:  It was recently revealed in a new study that the prevalence of Female psychopaths and sociopaths is likely significantly greater than previously estimated, likely because they often use different tactics compared to male ones, and because other people's cognitive biases don't always easily register their behavior as such.  That said, unlike patriarchy, there is truly ZERO evidence that Matriarchal societies systematically incentivize psychopathy/sociopathy in any way, and in fact they strongly disincentivize psychopaths and sociopaths from rising to the top.  In fact, the very best way to defang, neutralize, and ultimately prevent such evil people, regardless of gender, from doing so is Female Empowerment in general, hands down.  It is really only when Women in general are disempowered, that the psychopaths (of either gender) inevitably fill the resulting power vacuum sooner or later.

2026 UPDATE:  Rest in peace, Guru Rasa Von Werder.  Forever a legend, never to be forgotten.

Happy Heavenly Birthday, Guru Rasa!

By Ajax the Great (Pete Jackson)

Rasa Von Werder 

1945-2026

On July 16, 2026, you would have been 81 years young.  I truly believed that for sure you would live to be at least 90, give or take, but apparently Mother God had other plans, as She works in mysterious ways.  And regardless, I know you are in a much, much better place now, in the arms of the Great Mother.

So I wish you a Happy Heavenly Birthday, Guru Rasa!

This Blog Will Be Updated Irregularly Going Forward

Just a heads up, dear followers.  Due to current events, going forward, this blog will be updated on a more irregular basis than in the past.  Don't worry, this blog is not going away!  Stay tuned, everyone.

To be continued.......

"Army Of Mother God" Video From 2015

A 2015 video by "Female Supremacy Now", about the late, great Guru Rasa Von Werder (RIP) and the emergence of a New Matriarchal Religion, Goddess willing.  Please share this video far and wide, everyone!  It's what she would have wanted.

VIVE LA FEMME!  VIVE LA DIFFERENCE!

If Purgatory Had A Soundtrack

I had been meaning to post this for a while, and now I finally got around to doing so.  As you may know, the late, great Guru Rasa Von Werder was a long time minister to souls in Purgatory.  Those who have been following her know some pretty famous (and infamous) names among those who she managed to get out of there.  My own personal views on the idea of Purgatory are a bit nuanced, complex, and in some ways still "on the fence", but it is certainly worth noting here nonetheless.

I have long wondered, what would the soundtrack of Purgatory be?  My personal favorite band, Five Finger Death Punch, has written several songs that could very easily fit the bill for that.  The lyrics may not exactly be about Purgatory proper (though the song I.O.U. does explicitly use that word nonetheless), but the earthly struggles (PTSD, war, addiction, regret, etc.) they discuss might as well be.

So here goes, largely in chronological order:

1) Far From Home 

2) Wrong Side of Heaven (and the Righteous Side of Hell)

3) The Agony of Regret (instrumental)

4) Cold

5) Digging My Own Grave

6) I Apologize 

7) Darkness Settles In

8) Judgement Day

9) I.O.U.

10) The End

And many more as well.  Never forget about the souls in Purgatory!

Is Demarchy (Sortition) A Pathway To Matriarchy By Stealth?

Convo by Pete Jackson and William Bond (2 out of 3 Musketeers), edited for clarity and brevity:

PETE:  Good morning, William.  I thought of another idea recently to get more women in power by stealth.  This would probably only work on the local scale, but as the saying goes, "all politics is local", and "you can't fight CITY Hall".

Enter "Demarchy", also known as "sortition" or "lottocracy" (see Wikipedia article here), where our leaders are selected at random by lottery, much like jury duty.  Ancient Athenians did that, as do the Amish to this day.  Problem is, both are/were extremely patriarchal.  My idea is, do that, at first gender neutral, but very crucially, unlike jury duty, make it OPTIONAL, so if one is selected, they are free to decline it without penalty, and select someone else, and so on.  That way, mostly Women will choose to take the positions, which will be more responsibility but very little added perks compared to not serving, and we all know how most men are congenitally allergic to responsibility, lol.  Men would be far more likely to opt out.  Result will be Women ultimately having more power than men, and the rest will be history, or should I say, HERSTORY.

What do you think?

WILLIAM:  Hi Pete

I have heard of the Demarchy, concept before. I agree that most men are not interested in political power but the problem is with the minority of men who do want political power. These men will do or say anything to gain power and use Machiavelli tactics to do this. Also the weakness of any democratic system is that wealthy men will bribe politicians to do what they want and unfortunately there are women politicians who are just as corrupt as male politicians. 

I think the only idea that might work is to have a matriarchal political party, of only women. Who believe in caring for the people they rule. Although I’m sure feminists will be strongly opposed to this and the party has to be strict about stamping out bribery and corruption. 

Regards William

PETE:  You are probably correct, William. I will think on this some more. 

Thank you for your insights 😊 

Pete

(PETE ADDS SOME ALLITERATION:  Alas, as I like to say, Mechanization is no match for the Machiavellian machinations of the moneyed elites.  Most of whom are MEN.)

WILLIAM:  Hi Pete

There is another way to look at this. While I was writing my latest book I was wondering that if God is a woman, then why are we living in a patriarchal society? You would assume that She would ensure that women ruled the world. But if I’m right that the purpose of our planet is for women to teach men how to love. Then She might of thought that perhaps letting men rule the world, might teach men some sense of responsibility. But I don’t think that has worked out.

But perhaps MotherGod is changing her mind about this, as we see with the rise of the Suffragettes and Feminists in the 20th century. So if MotherGod has decided that women should rule the world then that is going to happen.

Regards William

PETE:  Much to think about here, but I think you are right about that, William. Thank you for your excellent insights as usual.  

May your last prediction come true soon, Goddess willing!