Uh oh. Looks like men are becoming redundant even more quickly than I had predicted, according to the latest predictions about technological unemployment. According to the White House, who keep in mind would typically want to paint a rosier picture than is actually the case, if you make less than $20/hour today, there is an 83% chance that robotics/automation will eventually take your job. And if you make between $20-40/hour, there is a roughly 31% chance that you will lose your job to technology in the future, which drops to negligible levels for those making over $40/hour. And whether enough new jobs will be created in the meantime to offset such job losses still remains to be seen.
Of course, those figures are for people of both genders. But there is good reason to believe that things will be significantly worse for men in that regard, since Women are leaving men in the dust in terms of educational attainment and are thus more likely to get the best jobs of the future. That is especially true for higher-paying and higher-skilled jobs, but also true for any jobs that can't be outsourced or automated and don't require much brute muscle power. And as the general pace of life continues to accelerate, more and more multitasking (which men aren't exactly known for) and speed will be required in nearly all jobs. Thus if technology doesn't take your job, Women eventually will, fellas. And when the next big economic crash happens, it will likely be you who needs to be rescued by the better half of humanity.
So how does knowing that make you feel, fellas? If your answer is "like I want to worship Women even more, and help them take over", you're basically golden. Otherwise, now is the time to do some serious soul-searching, because in the not-too-distant future (sooner than you think) there will be "no country for burly men". And remember, as the saying goes, "don't be a fool, stay in school"--even if that is no longer a guarantee of anything anymore. Failing that, I suppose you can always go join the circus, lol.
Wednesday, February 24, 2016
Saturday, February 13, 2016
The Drone Problem
No, not that drone problem (i.e. the use of unmanned airplanes in today's warfare). The other drone problem, namely, what to do with all of the unemployed or underemployed men of the future?
I recently posted an article about the coming crash of 2016, and how men would likely be hit so hard by it that they will never fully recover, and will be begging Women for a bailout (and will thus surrender sooner than otherwise). Even if there is no crash in 2016, the long-term trends are clear enough as evident in even the most cursory look at the statistics. We can all see the writing on the wall. Women are rising, while men are falling. In fact, women have already crossed the Rubicon in terms of education and are well on their way to becoming the richer gender, meanwhile us fellas are falling away and falling apart. We are being gradually replaced by both women (for higher-skilled jobs) as well as robots/machines/AI (for less-skilled jobs), our wages have been falling, our once-great labor unions have been torpedoed by the powerful men at the top who threw the bottom 80-90% of us under the bus, and we are thus are becoming increasingly redundant.
So what should be done with all of the redundant drone males after Women finally take over? Ultimately, it will be up to the Women of the future, of course, but now is the time to start discussing the best course of action to take in both the near- and long-term. Currently, we are witnessing the death of an obsolete system, one that has been kept on life support for many years now, and sooner or later we will have to pull the plug on it. Continuing to prop up that woefully moribund system in the hopes of propping up men is clearly not a sustainable long-term solution. And while men are slowly going extinct due to deterioration of the Y-chromosome, that will take thousands of years to occur. So what to do from now until then?
While I can immediately think of several unethical solutions to the drone problem (which I will not repeat here), the challenge is to come up with an ethical-yet-effective solution. My theory is still a work in progress, but what I have so far is as follows. We should adopt as much of the progressive libertarian TSAP platform as possible, or at least the following measures. First, a Universal Basic Income Guarantee for all is an idea that is LONG overdue. We also need to pass the Humphrey-Hawkins Full Employment Act, as well as raise the minimum wage. And as for those drones who would theoretically get priced out of the job market, well they can go join the circus. Free the animals and replace them with men--and I am only half-joking about that one. (We will need to have plenty of "bread and circuses" in the future to keep the drones occupied while they party their way into extinction.) Additionally, we need to invest more in both infrastructure and education, and that would create many jobs. But ultimately, there will be a lot fewer jobs in the future, and we need to be prepared for that. As the late, great Buckminster Fuller famously said in 1970:
And keep in mind that he was also a huge advocate of Women taking over the world as well. He also noted that there are enough resources in the world for everyone to live like a millionaire, but that those resources are being hoarded and wasted by the oligarchs. And when Women do take over, they will likely reject the outdated notion of scarcity and create a new paradigm of abundance for all. Which is especially good for the drone problem since there are two scenarios in which men become especially dangerous creatures: 1) when they have too much power relative to Women, and 2) when they are desperate for money--ever see the movie Fargo, for example? Both scenarios occur all too often under patriarchy, and and both issues would be effectively solved by Matriarchy, that we may all be free to enjoy mutual benefit and protection. What better time than now?
I recently posted an article about the coming crash of 2016, and how men would likely be hit so hard by it that they will never fully recover, and will be begging Women for a bailout (and will thus surrender sooner than otherwise). Even if there is no crash in 2016, the long-term trends are clear enough as evident in even the most cursory look at the statistics. We can all see the writing on the wall. Women are rising, while men are falling. In fact, women have already crossed the Rubicon in terms of education and are well on their way to becoming the richer gender, meanwhile us fellas are falling away and falling apart. We are being gradually replaced by both women (for higher-skilled jobs) as well as robots/machines/AI (for less-skilled jobs), our wages have been falling, our once-great labor unions have been torpedoed by the powerful men at the top who threw the bottom 80-90% of us under the bus, and we are thus are becoming increasingly redundant.
So what should be done with all of the redundant drone males after Women finally take over? Ultimately, it will be up to the Women of the future, of course, but now is the time to start discussing the best course of action to take in both the near- and long-term. Currently, we are witnessing the death of an obsolete system, one that has been kept on life support for many years now, and sooner or later we will have to pull the plug on it. Continuing to prop up that woefully moribund system in the hopes of propping up men is clearly not a sustainable long-term solution. And while men are slowly going extinct due to deterioration of the Y-chromosome, that will take thousands of years to occur. So what to do from now until then?
While I can immediately think of several unethical solutions to the drone problem (which I will not repeat here), the challenge is to come up with an ethical-yet-effective solution. My theory is still a work in progress, but what I have so far is as follows. We should adopt as much of the progressive libertarian TSAP platform as possible, or at least the following measures. First, a Universal Basic Income Guarantee for all is an idea that is LONG overdue. We also need to pass the Humphrey-Hawkins Full Employment Act, as well as raise the minimum wage. And as for those drones who would theoretically get priced out of the job market, well they can go join the circus. Free the animals and replace them with men--and I am only half-joking about that one. (We will need to have plenty of "bread and circuses" in the future to keep the drones occupied while they party their way into extinction.) Additionally, we need to invest more in both infrastructure and education, and that would create many jobs. But ultimately, there will be a lot fewer jobs in the future, and we need to be prepared for that. As the late, great Buckminster Fuller famously said in 1970:
We should do away with the absolutely specious notion that everybody has to earn a living. It is a fact today that one in ten thousand of us can make a technological breakthrough capable of supporting all the rest. The youth of today are absolutely right in recognizing this nonsense of earning a living. We keep inventing jobs because of this false idea that everybody has to be employed at some kind of drudgery because, according to Malthusian Darwinian theory he must justify his right to exist. So we have inspectors of inspectors and people making instruments for inspectors to inspect inspectors. The true business of people should be to go back to school and think about whatever it was they were thinking about before somebody came along and told them they had to earn a living.
And keep in mind that he was also a huge advocate of Women taking over the world as well. He also noted that there are enough resources in the world for everyone to live like a millionaire, but that those resources are being hoarded and wasted by the oligarchs. And when Women do take over, they will likely reject the outdated notion of scarcity and create a new paradigm of abundance for all. Which is especially good for the drone problem since there are two scenarios in which men become especially dangerous creatures: 1) when they have too much power relative to Women, and 2) when they are desperate for money--ever see the movie Fargo, for example? Both scenarios occur all too often under patriarchy, and and both issues would be effectively solved by Matriarchy, that we may all be free to enjoy mutual benefit and protection. What better time than now?
Friday, February 5, 2016
Another Must-See Video
I recently came across another YouTube video, this one about the things that we can all do more of to help accelerate the already-inevitable transition to Matriarchy. The sooner that Women take over, the better it will be for everyone. Food for thought indeed:
Also be sure to view the other videos linked to this one on YouTube as well. VIVE LA FEMME!
Also be sure to view the other videos linked to this one on YouTube as well. VIVE LA FEMME!
Tuesday, January 26, 2016
Will the Coming Crash of 2016 Accelerate the Transition to Matriarchy?
Recently, I posted an article on the True Spirit of America blog titled, "Is the Crash of 2016 Upon Us?". In it, I outlined the various reasons why I predict that author Thom Hartmann was probably right in that there will be another financial crisis and stock market crash in 2016, perhaps even one that that will make 2008 and even 1929 look like a walk in the park. Yes I know, I could in fact be wrong. But recent events are making it look increasingly likely every day.
So what does that have to do with Matriarchy and the inevitable transition in that direction? Turns out, a lot in fact. Basically, in order for women to finally reclaim their rightful position as the new leaders of the free world, men need to surrender to them. And most men will not surrender until they truly hit rock bottom. It's just our nature that way. Of course, even with the most cursory look at the statistics (and an open mind), we can all see the writing on the wall. Women are rising, while men are falling. In fact, women have already crossed the Rubicon in terms of education and are well on their way to becoming the richer gender, meanwhile us fellas are falling away and falling apart. We are being gradually replaced by both women (for higher-skilled jobs) as well as robots/machines/AI (for less-skilled jobs), our wages have been falling, our once-great labor unions have been busted by the powerful men at the top who threw the bottom 80-90% of us under the bus, and we are thus are becoming increasingly redundant. And the past two recessions, especially 2008-2009, have basically been dubbed "mancessions", in which men got hit significantly harder than women in terms of un(der)employment (excluding of course the "austerity" government budget cuts that happened in 2010-2013, that hurt women more than men). We must note, and it bears repeating, that this is NOT the fault of women, but rather the result of our very own karma.
Thus, if the next crash is like 2008 or worse, I predict that men will likely be collectively hit so hard that they will never fully recover. We still haven't fully recovered from the last one, so this time would likely be the ultimate death blow for us. Sooner or later, it is only a matter of time before men will be begging women for a bailout. And when that happens, women would then be in the power position. Not right away, but we can see how this could accelerate the transition.
So fellas, it is time to do some serious soul-searching. If you have not yet renounced the demonic patriarchy in all of its forms, now is the time to do it. God willing, we will soon need women to rescue us. Because let's face it, we have dug our own graves and will be in over our heads in no time. It will happen sooner than you think. And when women finally do take over, they will remember exactly how they were treated, so it really behooves us fellas to clean up our act yesterday.
So what does that have to do with Matriarchy and the inevitable transition in that direction? Turns out, a lot in fact. Basically, in order for women to finally reclaim their rightful position as the new leaders of the free world, men need to surrender to them. And most men will not surrender until they truly hit rock bottom. It's just our nature that way. Of course, even with the most cursory look at the statistics (and an open mind), we can all see the writing on the wall. Women are rising, while men are falling. In fact, women have already crossed the Rubicon in terms of education and are well on their way to becoming the richer gender, meanwhile us fellas are falling away and falling apart. We are being gradually replaced by both women (for higher-skilled jobs) as well as robots/machines/AI (for less-skilled jobs), our wages have been falling, our once-great labor unions have been busted by the powerful men at the top who threw the bottom 80-90% of us under the bus, and we are thus are becoming increasingly redundant. And the past two recessions, especially 2008-2009, have basically been dubbed "mancessions", in which men got hit significantly harder than women in terms of un(der)employment (excluding of course the "austerity" government budget cuts that happened in 2010-2013, that hurt women more than men). We must note, and it bears repeating, that this is NOT the fault of women, but rather the result of our very own karma.
Thus, if the next crash is like 2008 or worse, I predict that men will likely be collectively hit so hard that they will never fully recover. We still haven't fully recovered from the last one, so this time would likely be the ultimate death blow for us. Sooner or later, it is only a matter of time before men will be begging women for a bailout. And when that happens, women would then be in the power position. Not right away, but we can see how this could accelerate the transition.
So fellas, it is time to do some serious soul-searching. If you have not yet renounced the demonic patriarchy in all of its forms, now is the time to do it. God willing, we will soon need women to rescue us. Because let's face it, we have dug our own graves and will be in over our heads in no time. It will happen sooner than you think. And when women finally do take over, they will remember exactly how they were treated, so it really behooves us fellas to clean up our act yesterday.
Sunday, January 24, 2016
How To Really Defeat ISIL For Good
The USA and coalition forces have been bombing Daesh/ISIL (which we
prefer to call them so as not to inadvertently profane the name of the
Goddess) for over a year now, 17 months to be exact. And Russia has
been bombing them for nearly three months now. And yet they still seem
to be spreading, even though they are clearly on the losing side in the
long run. After the first few weeks of bombing in August/September
2014, the fight basically became a stalemate which lasted until Russia
started their airstrikes in Syria, tipping the balance against Daesh
once more.
Now the hawks such as Donald Chump are, unsurprisingly, calling for an escalation of this war. Clearly, we are already fighting fire with gasoline, and those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. In fact, it was our own meddling and warmongering that caused Daesh to become a problem in the first place! But here is a better idea--let's NOT give Daesh the "holy war" they so desperately want. In fact, Tom Englehardt (Tom Dispatch) and Peter van Buren have the best idea of all--quick withdrawal, after getting them where it really hurts by taking out their OIL. Such targets--wellheads and oil trucks--are not at all hard to find, and are fairly easy to take out from the air. And put diplomatic and economic pressure on Turkey and other so-called "allies" to stem the flow of Daesh oil as well. Because oil is their primary source of funding, and removing that will cause them to quickly collapse of their own weight, and when they are seen as a failure then few would want to join them. And once we take it out, then GTFO and let Daesh fall on their own sword.
I and the TSAP agree with that idea, and we would also like to add to that. Before withdrawing, we should give every *woman* over there an AK-47 and tell them to take over their country and mow down anyone who stands in their way. Let Allah sort it out. Problem solved. But of course, the mostly-male powers that be would not be too keen on that idea. After all, they wouldn't want women in THIS country getting any ideas, now would they? (Of course, I believe that women must take over the world in order to save it, so that wouldn't really be a bad idea)
Honestly, it is certainly a better idea than arming questionable male "rebels" who end up turning traitor. VIVE LA FEMME!
Now the hawks such as Donald Chump are, unsurprisingly, calling for an escalation of this war. Clearly, we are already fighting fire with gasoline, and those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. In fact, it was our own meddling and warmongering that caused Daesh to become a problem in the first place! But here is a better idea--let's NOT give Daesh the "holy war" they so desperately want. In fact, Tom Englehardt (Tom Dispatch) and Peter van Buren have the best idea of all--quick withdrawal, after getting them where it really hurts by taking out their OIL. Such targets--wellheads and oil trucks--are not at all hard to find, and are fairly easy to take out from the air. And put diplomatic and economic pressure on Turkey and other so-called "allies" to stem the flow of Daesh oil as well. Because oil is their primary source of funding, and removing that will cause them to quickly collapse of their own weight, and when they are seen as a failure then few would want to join them. And once we take it out, then GTFO and let Daesh fall on their own sword.
I and the TSAP agree with that idea, and we would also like to add to that. Before withdrawing, we should give every *woman* over there an AK-47 and tell them to take over their country and mow down anyone who stands in their way. Let Allah sort it out. Problem solved. But of course, the mostly-male powers that be would not be too keen on that idea. After all, they wouldn't want women in THIS country getting any ideas, now would they? (Of course, I believe that women must take over the world in order to save it, so that wouldn't really be a bad idea)
Honestly, it is certainly a better idea than arming questionable male "rebels" who end up turning traitor. VIVE LA FEMME!
Tuesday, January 19, 2016
Why I Am Feeling the BERN in 2016
It's 2016, and Election Day will be right around the corner. And the
True Spirit of America Party will be unequivocally endorsing Bernie
Sanders for President. On essentially all of the issues, his platform is the one that is closest to ours among all the candidates that have a chance this year.
As much as I want a woman to be President yesterday, which is LONG overdue, the TSAP will not be endorsing Hillary since we believe that she is simply not progressive enough for us or for the nation. Granted, she is FAR better than literally any Rethuglican candidate out there (puke!), and I would much rather vote for her instead of any of them, but I still feel that Bernie is the better choice overall this time around. As Pat Ravasio of Buckyworld has noted, his preferred paradigm is far more feminine than Hillary's, ironically. And unfortunately Elizabeth Warren is not going to be running this year, nor is the woman who we feel would really be the ideal President, Marianne Williamson. Now SHE would be great, and I believe electing her would really accelerate the transition to Matriarchal utopia by about a decade or two ahead of time. Bernie is the next best thing, and in fact Marianne herself is endorsing him as well. So yes, I am FEELING THE BERN!!!
As much as I want a woman to be President yesterday, which is LONG overdue, the TSAP will not be endorsing Hillary since we believe that she is simply not progressive enough for us or for the nation. Granted, she is FAR better than literally any Rethuglican candidate out there (puke!), and I would much rather vote for her instead of any of them, but I still feel that Bernie is the better choice overall this time around. As Pat Ravasio of Buckyworld has noted, his preferred paradigm is far more feminine than Hillary's, ironically. And unfortunately Elizabeth Warren is not going to be running this year, nor is the woman who we feel would really be the ideal President, Marianne Williamson. Now SHE would be great, and I believe electing her would really accelerate the transition to Matriarchal utopia by about a decade or two ahead of time. Bernie is the next best thing, and in fact Marianne herself is endorsing him as well. So yes, I am FEELING THE BERN!!!
Friday, January 15, 2016
This Video Needs to Go VIRAL!
The following video was made by the Facebook group Female Supremacy Now and is about the distinguished Guru Rasa von Werder, the de facto leader of the Matriarchy movement and one of the greatest prophets of our time. The video is about her as well as about the movement as a whole, especially the spiritual side of the movement. And it needs to go viral. Watch it, and SHARE it far and wide!
Also, be sure to check out and share the following videos as well:
William Bond, noted author and Matriarchal pundit, and friend of Guru Rasa, on why Women should rule the world:
Marianne Williamson, another great prophet of our time, speaks at the 2015 Parliament of the World's Religions. While not an avowed matriarchalist herself, she is a huge supporter of female empowerment nonetheless. Brava!
Russell Means, an American Indian Movement activist, discusses Matriarchy as well:
Also, be sure to check out and share the following videos as well:
William Bond, noted author and Matriarchal pundit, and friend of Guru Rasa, on why Women should rule the world:
Marianne Williamson, another great prophet of our time, speaks at the 2015 Parliament of the World's Religions. While not an avowed matriarchalist herself, she is a huge supporter of female empowerment nonetheless. Brava!
Russell Means, an American Indian Movement activist, discusses Matriarchy as well:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)