St. Padre Pio's Cat Story

Great video about St. Padre Pio and cats.  Apparently cats are our spiritual guardians, which actually makes a lot of sense when you think about it.  And they're very cute and fuzzy too ☺️

Good/Bad Guys Rasa Responds

Do Good Guys Really Benefit From Bad Guys?

Rasa Responds

By Ajax the Great (Pete Jackson)     Sunday, 23 March 2025

NOTE:  This article is primarily addressed to men

One question that comes up over and over again is, do men really benefit from patriarchy?  The nuanced answer is, "yes, in a relative sense, but NO in an absolute sense in the long run".  It ultimately hurts everyone across the board, backfiring on men as well sooner or later, per the law of karma.  I would hope anyone reading this would realize that patriarchy is inherently a negative-sum game (lose-lose) in the long run.  And everyone regardless of gender would ultimately be better off without it, except of course the tiny few at the very top of the whole pyramid scheme (because that's what it really is).

Rasa says:  It’s kind of like this: There was a Southern slave owner who starved his slaves of meat all year long. But on the 4^th of July he pulled out all the stops & gave them a royal feast: pork, beef & chicken – with all the trimmings – all they could eat. Did they benefit? Only on the 4^th. Most slave owners did not even provide shoes for the children  not even in winter  until they reached a certain age – so if one slave owner provides the poor kids winter shoes – do they benefit? We’re talking crumbs from the Master’s table….. Now I’m watching a British TV series called Pennmmaric. The last couple episodes the wife of the Penmmaric heir is being assaulted by him. He calls her a whore & reminds her that when he met her he gave her 5 sovereigns to go to bed with him – that makes her a whore, & he dredges up her past, how she went from man to men for financial benefits – basically for support. But that makes her a whore. We women were put into a position – by evil means – to depend on men for money. Whether it’s coins or bucks in hand or weekly support, or a house, or whatever, we ‘ve leaned on them because they arranged it so - & in the end they denounce us for it! Men STOLE from us & are still doing it by paying us less for the same work, giving us worse jobs, & depriving us of opportunities. But do we BENEFIT from this patriarchy? Yes & no. As Ajax says, in some ways yes, in the long run no. That’ why we’re working to dismember patriarchy & assemble Matriarchy, so all would benefit.

AJAX (PETE) SAYS:  That's a great way to put it, Rasa.  Makes a lot of sense how you say it.  The sooner patriarchy ends and gives way to Matriarchy, the better off we will all be.

But what about the related question, do good guys really benefit from the existence of bad guys?  After all, bad guys are found in literally all walks of life and all socioeconomic classes, not just at the top (though they seem to be overrepresented there, not coincidentally).  Again, the answer is nuanced.  While it is true that the existence of bad guys (broadly defined here, ranging from crappy to absolutely horrible monsters) does set the bar for men in general at a pitifully low level, which makes it easier for the good guys to clear, this comparative advantage collapses when one considers the other effect that bad guys have.  Namely, the existence of bad guys makes it obviously harder for Women to trust men in general, so the good guys get lumped in with the bad guys and thus have a that much harder time getting Women to trust them enough to be with them in whatever way.  To put it in quasi-economic terms, this "safety tax" that bad guys impose on Women in general ultimately gets passed on to men in general in the form of a "risk tariff", thus making the dating market that much harder and costlier for the good guys as well.  Thus, we see here that any relative comparative advantage that good guys gain from the existence of bad guys is NOT worth it on balance, and the good guys would be better off without the existence of the bad guys, period.

 

          Rasa says: I wish you would define exactly what is a good guy & a bad guy & give some examples of behavior. As I find it difficult to respond without those details. It isn’t good for me to ASSUME I know what you mean because I could be off……for example –

There are criminal men, say a poacher, who shoots a deer on the wealthy landlord’s property. In a British TV series I saw, “A Horseman Riding By” this man get FIVE YEARS for the crime {he also broke the jaw of the game warden, so that was part of the sentence, lol}.

 Now at my local supermarket, routinely, this happens: You see something on SALE. Say recently the Pink Lady apples said 1.99 a pound. So I bought a bunch. But on the register it said $2.49. I caught it & received back the overcharge. This happened twice with the same apples within weeks – also with avocadoes & other items - I have received refunds from this market many times. I have never seen anyone else check their receipt or demand restitution. What happens is they accidentally on purpose forget to put into the computer the sale price, so they are STEALING from the customers & as I said I’ve never seen anyone else demand restitution so they are counting on the negligence of the customer to check what they are actually charged, so they make extra money by stealing. But of course, lol, they won’t go to jail for this…..

Another example – they keep changing the law so the rich get richer. In old days the rich simply took over the land of the poor – the King gave it to them, & it rendered these people who’d lived off the land {& owned cottages} for generations, destitute. But it was against the law to beg & when they begged they were given a brand on their forehead &/or jailed.

Now in the last few years they found gas & oil under the land here where I live – including my own – from what they cal the ‘Marcellus Shale.’ People were to get big money for this. So what did the local govt. do? They passed a law called the WINDFALL TAX where they get 40% of the initial payoff, which in my case would have been 40% of abut $250k {except I didn’t sign & our state passed fracking laws, so it never happened.} What was the windfall tax? Just another evil law to steal from the poor. So these examples are the bad guys. The good guys don’t do crimes like this, mugging people or business crimes.

{And btw the local owner of my supermarket is the nicest, sweetest guy you ever met, & his manager is the most helpful.  I get along great with both of them, but this is a mask for the conspiracy to pilfer money out of the customers – they are both in on it as I have seen it played out.}Don’t assume that all the ‘bad guys’ appear evil!

Just remember, bandits WEAR MASKS when they rob the bank!

 AJAX (PETE) SAYS:  All of that is unfortunately very true, Rasa.  And those masks can be either literal or figurative.  Most bad guys indeed wear some flavor of a "Good Guy" mask.  The self-proclaimed "Nice Guys" (TM) are in fact often the very worst when their masks begin to slip.  That includes the more modern incarnation, the fake "allies" and fake "empaths" as well, of course.  If a guy has to loudly broadcast that he is an ally or an empath, it means that he is probably NOT, or at the very least he doesn't practice what he preaches, and it goes downhill from there.  As for my definitions of "good guys" and "bad guys", I meant that in relative and general terms based on ethics, morals, virtues, or lack thereof.  And of course there is also a third category:  "neutral", those who all too often get swayed by the bad guys.

It's a deadweight loss to everyone, in other words.  That is, the marginal costs the bad guys impose outweigh any marginal benefits.

          Rasa says: Explain the costs & the marginal benefits

 AJAX (PETE) SAYS:  While men in general in one sense benefit from lowered standards overall for men in general ("hey, at least I am not like those jerks over there!") and thus things may SEEM easier as a result, such marginal benefits to the good and neutral guys are rather hollow when one considers that those same bad guys are the reason why Women have a hard time trusting men in general, as it can be difficult to tell friend from foe.  And when Women have a hard time trusting men in general, that has a chilling effect on any relationships that good guys may have or would otherwise have with Women.  The "male loneliness epidemic" is caused primarily by the bad guys, in other words.

WILLIAM SAYS:  I can give a personal story of how a bad guy effects my relationship with my wife. When I met my wife she was divorced, but her first husband was verbally abusive. So when she got involved with me she appreciates the fact I am a nice guy. This is also true of her children whom don't like their father and have said they wish I had been their dad. So they all contrast me with my wife's first husband and it makes me look good. 

AJAX (PETE) SAYS: That is true, William. And of course at the same time, unfortunately, the fact that Women have a hard time trusting men in general as a result of the bad guys has a chilling effect, to say nothing of all the trauma they inflict on Women. How many relationships would have otherwise occurred but don't as a result of what the bad guys do? So the net effect of bad guys is still harmful overall, even if there are some bright spots.

So fellas, if you really are genuinely good guys, stop validating and making excuses for the bad guys and stop mindlessly going with the flow.  You're not really helping anyone even remotely worthy of help by doing so, as neutrality only benefits the oppressors and never the victims, and you are ultimately hindering yourselves in the long run.

          Rasa says: There are very few men who ever care about or fight for women’s rights – they see it as hurting themselves & their privileges, & being traitors to their gender. Some of the men are brainwashed to believe, this is as it has to be – men should be controlling women. They WANT to believe this so they do. And sadly, some men wan to be dominated but instead of working for the Cause, they prefer to be dominated in a paid sexual setting, where they tell the dominatrix what they want – she does it & gets paid – this is called ‘topping from the bottom.’

          You might say what about the men who have joined NOW? And work as volunteers in their offices. As usual, men want to hang around & take part wherever there are women so they could get to know the women, be friends or on the odd chance, get laid, lol. I’ve seen this as I belonged to NOW. They aren’t there for authentic reasons; they’re there to get something out of it.     

That’s why I suggest when we start this new Order, men are NOT to be allowed entrance as volunteers or ‘friends’, it has to be all women as the men who would join have ulterior motives.  Even men who offer big donations – you have to be leery of because they want that pound of flesh. When we do accept men as members they must be totally under the control of the Order & obedient to its rules – they have no authority whatever & have little rights. This is not ordinary life – in life they can go out & do whatever, but in our Order it is the way we say it is – matriarchal.

I might add that we should eventually have some communities where we have generations of matriarchy – grandmother, daughter, granddaughter - & the men who are part of the family within the household. For privacy we could have cottages surrounding the main house, but the cottages are not where the man takes advantage beats up the wife & abuses the kids. The cottages are close enough so we can see what is going on if there is something out of line – especially with the children. All children should be housed in the main house up to a certain age {we need to discuss this-how it would work out because there is the issue of privacy vs safety…too much privacy to the man, he takes advantage - perhaps the husband & wife could have their cottage at certain times, not every day—this all needs to be worked out by the Elders}, then they can live in the Mom & Dad cottage if they wish. But remember, the nuclear family is designed to give freedom to the man & take it away from the wife & children.

AJAX (PETE) SAYS:  That is unfortunately true as well, Rasa.  Indeed, when it comes to the Order, you really do NOT want any such "foxes in the hen house", so it makes sense NOT to allow any men to join whatsoever at first.  And in the distant future if and when men are allowed to join in some capacity, it would probably be best for them to be associated as loosely and peripherally as possible.  (Note to the reader:  my own words in this article are speaking generally and are intended primarily about the outside world, not Rasa's Order.)

AJAX (PETE) SAYS:  That's all for now.  Very well said overall, Rasa.  Keep up the great work!

Do Good Guys Really Benefit From Bad Guys?

NOTE:  This article is primarily addressed to any men reading this.

One question that comes up over and over again is, do men really benefit from patriarchy?  The nuanced answer is, "yes, in a relative sense, but NO in an absolute sense in the long run".  It ultimately hurts everyone across the board, backfiring on men as well sooner or later, per the law of karma.  I would hope anyone reading this would realize that patriarchy is inherently a negative-sum game (lose-lose) in the long run.  And everyone regardless of gender would ultimately be better off without it, except of course the tiny few at the very top of the whole pyramid scheme (because that's what it really is).

But what about the related question, do good guys really benefit from the existence of bad guys?  After all, bad guys are found in literally all walks of life and all socioeconomic classes, not just at the top (though they seem to be overrepresented there, not coincidentally).  Again, the answer is nuanced.  While it is true that the existence of bad guys (broadly defined here, ranging from crappy to absolutely horrible monsters) does set the bar for men in general at a pitifully low level, which makes it easier for the good guys to clear, this comparative advantage collapses when one considers the other effect that bad guys have.  Namely, the existence of bad guys makes it obviously harder for Women to trust men in general, so the good guys get lumped in with the bad guys and thus have a that much harder time getting Women to trust them enough to be with them in whatever way.  To put it in quasi-economic terms, this "safety tax" that bad guys impose on Women in general ultimately gets passed on to men in general in the form of a "risk tariff", thus making the dating market that much harder and costlier for the good guys as well.  Thus, we see here that any relative comparative advantage that good guys gain from the existence of bad guys is NOT worth it on balance, and the good guys would be better off without the existence of the bad guys, period.

It's a deadweight loss to everyone, in other words.  That is, the marginal costs the bad guys impose outweigh any marginal benefits.

So fellas, if you really are genuinely good guys, stop validating and making excuses for the bad guys and stop mindlessly going with the flow.  You're not really helping anyone even remotely worthy of help by doing so, as neutrality only benefits the oppressors and never the victims, and you are ultimately hindering yourselves in the long run.

(Mic drop)

"The Religion Of Sex!" by Rasa Von Werder and William Bond

 

We are ‘The Religion of Sex’!

 William Bond    March 15, 2025

 

HI Rasa 

I think if we are to start a new religion I think we have to be realistic about it. All successful religions are businesses, they are ways of making money or gaining political power. I know many religions like Christianity and Buddhism talk about living lives of poverty. But the people who rule these religions don’t think like this. We can see this with St. Francis of Assisi, he lived a life of poverty and was greatly revered because of this. But while he was doing this the Pope Cardinals and Bishops were living lives of luxury and privilege. No Pope or Cardinal has ever tried to live like St. Francis of Assisi.

 

          Rasa says: Good point. What a great difference between the Saints poverty & suffering, & the ease of most high-up prelates – day & night. Some of the Catholic dignitaries lived like Kings & were treated as such. Everyone looked up to them, even the Saints, who had to swear allegiance & obedience to them or get kicked out! And Priests, in general, were treated with respect – in the old days everyone kissed their hand! 

We see this all over the world, the leaders of any successful religion run it like a business and if the business model no longer works then the religion declines. I see this in England, the Church of England in the 19th century was a very rich and powerful religious sect. But then in the 20th century people couldn’t bother to go to church and give money, then the whole business model collapsed and the church is now surviving by selling off it’s churches and land. This means if we think of it like a business we have to think about what people want. 

          Rasa says: So it’s that bad over there? Good, Patriarchy is DYING & religion is one of their tools by which they oppress women – powerful tools, as they make people believe this or that. Like sin was introduced to the word by Eve. - That women must obey men, men are the head of the family. That women must be virtuous & get stoned to death if not – but men can be let go. Etc. A lot of rot is taught through patriarchal religions to hold women down, as we all know. 

 So I think what we have to think about; why would anyone want to join a matriarchal religion? It has become obvious to me that talking about, why God is a Woman or why would should rule the world, doesn’t attract a lot of interest. Because people are more interested in their basic instincts. I think you made the point some time ago Rasa, that on your Youtube videos you get more hits when you exposed more of your breasts. Like it or not, that is what people are like and if we are to attract a popular following we have to accept this.  

So why would ordinary people want to join a matriarchal religion? If we appeal to people’s basic instincts then we can offer something that patriarchy cannot give people and that is a safe place to have sex. The weakness of patriarchy is that it’s anti-sexual and it’s laws and custom restrict the sexual lives of ordinary people.

 

          Rasa says: You hit the NAIL ON THE HEAD. This is it, how we go. I’m going to change the name of my You Tube from “New Religion for Women” to “The Religion of Sex.” Because that is what makes US DIFFERENT than any other religion & that is what I have symbolized & that is what I’ve been preaching {that sex is not a sin.} But I did not think of calling or naming it or branding it this way – but there, you’ve DONE IT & it’s so appropriate it’s from the lips of God to my ears!

 

Patriarchy has put up many barriers for people to come together for sex. Like marriage laws and making prostitution illegal. So the common way people have sex is to get married or live with someone. But the problem with that is people will have sex a lot when they first live together but soon become sexually bored with each other. But they are not allowed to have sex with anyone else.

 

Rasa:  Yes, variety is the spice of life, & why should we be limited with our sex partners? Who said so? I don’t think it was that way in the ancient days of matriarchy. The way I see it, women were the leaders & had sex with any man they chose, however many different ones they wanted, & the paternity of the child didn’t matter as she held all the resources, etc.

 

  There is also prostitution which is illegal which makes it scary because in many cases it’s run by criminals. While only wealthy women can use male escorts. Then there is the fear of VD if anyone sleeps around. Also if women are willing to have sex with many different men she is insulted and called a whore, slut and other derisory names. Which puts women off wanting to do that. Although it’s far more acceptable for men to have sex with as many women as he likes. 

 

Rasa says: One of the greatest items for Female Empowerment would be the DECRIMINALIZATION OF PROSTITUTION. Think how our social order would change if it was legal for women to demand money for sex! - & they were not shamed or looked down on for it. I mean every horn dog that is chasing a woman she could give him a price, {the more revolting he is, the higher the price} & then most of them would beg off & seek another woman for free – that would get rid of a lot of harassment.

And secondarily, there would be hardly any women left in poverty, for themselves or their children, if they could charge without fear of punishment or jail. Women have to go to welfare when they are destitute, but if they could charge for sex, there would be little poverty for women, as even the ugliest women would be wanted by someone – the ugliest men who no one wants.

 

So to give people a safe place to have sex, we have to think about women being in charge, but forget about whips, dungeons and black catsuits. We can make the point that sex should be an act of love and not about dominance and submission. So people can have sex however they like and with different partners providing it’s consensual. We can be a bit like the hippies and have free love but ban drugs and alcohol. As men are more likely to be violent when drunk, while drug addicts are more likely to end up as criminals. We can make it a rule that everyone has to have a VD test first, so everyone is free of VD. All sexual acts have to be consensual and no one is allowed in under the age of consent. We can make it clear this is a religion of love so all sexual acts are love making.

 

           

          Rasa say: Priceless. Do you realize what you have done William? It could be St. Patrick’s Day is tomorrow & he is giving me this through your words – a great GIFT –{he always blesses me}!  This pulls together the whole magilla – Matriarchy – loving God – religion. As I said long ago “Put God back into sex & sex back into religion.” But still, in the New Religion I put God over here, & sex over there, God PERMITTING it, but did not put SEX into the title or banner, but here, you have done it & I see it is SO RIGHT! Because THINK – every other religion, which is patriarchal, running the world is AGAINST FREEDOM OF SEX & here we are, the one & only religion PRO COMPLETE SEXUAL FREEDOM FOR ALL, INCLUDING WOMEN. This brings the whole picture together into a valid form, a complete doctrine making sex our HEADLINE – after all – it’s how we part from the others.

 Along with this, we can have a theology about why God is a Woman and why we all would be better of if women rule the world. As well as religious ceremonies. But to be realistic that won’t be what attracts people to a matriarchal religion. They will be more concerned about having a safe place to have sex and being with kind and caring people.     William

 Rasa says:  Understood. We have a new banner, angle, POV, reference point, & this will be our Highway to success, not just a Jet Plane but a Satellite! – a Rocket Ship! It all MAKES SENSE now! I’m envigorated, calibrated, straightened out. I SEE THE LIGHT at the end of the tunnel! The way I had the New Religion was righteous it IS abut female safe space, being in charge, having their own zeitgeist, their separate beneficial word – all I’ve said is true. But how do we get everyone to agree to this/ To want to be in it – both women & men? It’s the SEXUAL FREEDOM.

          I have my walking papers now, my Passport, my Lighthouse of how to proceed. This is new, different & better. I shall work now toward this with you guys helping. I will get on Face Book this way, the You tube will be changed – the TITLE & how I speak. And sooner than later I’ll hire someone to work with me full time to keep a strong internet presence. And of course there will be a book. I am eager to proceed, thanks William, I think you didn’t realize what you have done, but you did something to get us where we need to go.

AJAX THE GREAT (PETE JACKSON) SAYS:  Very well said, Rasa and William! Excellent ideas, both of you.  This will really put the New Religion, and Matriarchy in general, on the map.  And have a very Happy Saint Patrick's Day as well 😊 🍀