Gynocentrism is a dominant or exclusive focus on women in theory or practice. Anything can be gynocentric when it is considered exclusively with a female or feminist point of view in mind. The opposite practice, placing the masculine point of view at the centre, is androcentrism.
Vive La Difference!
On Ending the World's Longest War: the 7000+ Year Battle of the Sexes. By Ajax the Great (Pete Jackson). (Blog formerly known as "The Chalice and the Flame")
Friday, October 25, 2024
Gynocentrism Is Beautiful
Tuesday, October 22, 2024
Excellent Article By Celeste Davis
An excellent new article by the ever-insightful Celeste Davis is certainly worth a read. Titled "Do you not like sex, or do you just not like patriarchal sex?", it explains well the crucial differences between male-defined sexuality versus female-defined sexuality. Spoiler alert: male-defined sexuality is rather one-sided, and Women generally do not like it one-sided. Female-defined sexuality, on the other hand, is mutually beneficial for both genders. Thus it makes far more sense to center Women in sex than it does to center men.
In other news, water is wet, and the sun rises in the east and sets in the west, of course. But far too many people still don't seem to fully dig that. And Davis explains it brilliantly.
Tuesday, September 10, 2024
Excellent Article by Dr. Kirti Patel
Check out this excellent article by Dr. Kirti Patel about Matriarchy (or as she calls it, Gynarchy):
She really makes some excellent points indeed.
Sunday, September 8, 2024
Why We Still Need A Universal Basic Income Yesterday (Updated Re-Post)
I have repeatedly noted before why any serious proposal for a pragmatic protopia would require some sort of unconditional Universal Basic Income (UBI) Guarantee for all. (Note that the "U" itself also stands for "Unconditional", which is VERY important.) At least as long as we still have a monetary system, of course, and it will be quite some time before money can be phased out completely. And while the COVID-19 pandemic and the lockdowns are behind us, their grisly social and economic aftermath tends to linger, and thus it is still more crucial now than before 2020, and will still be for quite some time as well.
To wit:
- First and foremost, "It's payback time for Women". Recently, a Woman named Judith Shulevitz wrote an op-ed titled thusly, arguing in favor of a Universal Basic Income Guarantee for all. Her feminist argument for a UBI, which I agree 100% with, was that such a thing would provide long-overdue compensation for Women's unpaid work (i.e. housework and caregiving) that society currently takes for granted and considers a "free resource" for the taking. As the saying goes, there are two kinds of work that Women do: underpaid, and unpaid. While that is true for some men as well, it is overwhelmingly true for Women. Thus, her argument makes a great deal of sense overall, and I agree. It is indeed LONG overdue. And it applies a fortiori now in light of the fact that Women got the worst deal of all from the lockdown-induced job losses, the often triple burden for Mothers at home, the gnawing forced isolation from the support system of other Women, and the increased exposure to domestic violence during lockdown. And they are still continuing (and will continue) to suffer from the aftermath long after the lockdowns are behind us. Lockdown was patriarchy on crack, basically.
- Men are becoming increasingly redundant in the long run due to technology, globalization, and the overall ascendancy of Women. When men are no longer artificially propped up, they will fall--and the bigger they are, the harder they fall. And this will only increase in the near future. This is a potential ticking time-bomb that must be defused sooner rather than later. Men become extremely dangerous creatures under either of two conditions: 1) when they have too much power relative to Women, and/or 2) when they are desperate for money. Ever see the 1996 film Fargo? Indeed, a Universal Basic Income is one of the best ways to tackle the second one. Again, it only applies a fortiori now.
- A UBI is far more efficient in theory and practice than much of what currently passes for a social safety net these days, and would have far less bureaucracy. No means tests, no discrimination, no playing God. It's simply a basic human right, period. And it would be far less costly in the long run.
- As Buckminster Fuller famously noted, there are more than enough resources for everyone to live like a millionaire with today's technology. And he said this back in the 1970s, mind you. And the specious notion that everybody and their mother must "work for a living" is not only outdated, but is also seriously classist, ableist, and ageist, and by extension indirectly sexist and racist as well. The fact that human beings, unlike literally every other species on Earth, somehow must PAY to merely LIVE on the planet on which they were born is now totally contrived and socially constructed, and is in fact an egregious Crime Against Nature.
- Poverty is a razor-sharp, double-edged sword, spiritually speaking. Being attached to riches is clearly counter to spirituality, but then again, so is being attached to poverty. Either way, it's the *attachment* that is the problem. And poverty today is largely if not entirely man-made via artificial scarcity.
- We would all be better off on balance, spiritually and otherwise, if material poverty were eradicated--and a UBI is the most efficient way to do so. As William Bond (and others) noted, with today's technology that is certainly doable, but for the greed of the oligarchs at the top who control the system. And that in turn is a result of patriarchy, given how men tend to see war and scarcity as inevitable, so they create a self-fulfilling prophecy as a result.
- With an unconditional UBI instead of means testing or other conditions, gone will be the perverse incentives that exist under the current system that trap too many people in poverty today.
- Negative liberty and positive liberty are NOT opposites, but rather two sides of the same coin. Indeed, one cannot be truly free if one is systematically denied the basic necessities of life. And truly no one is free when others are oppressed in any way.
- Inequality, at least when it is as extreme as it is today, is profoundly toxic to society and makes the looming problems/crises of climate change and ecological overshoot that much more difficult to solve. This is over and above the effects of poverty alone. And a UBI can dramatically reduce both socio-economic inequality as well as absolute material poverty. (And when funded by an Alaska-style tax on fossil fuels, it can also double as a Steve Stoft or James Hansen-style carbon tax-and-dividend as well.)
- We consume and waste a ludicrous amount of (mostly fossil-fuel) energy in the so-called "developed" world, and much of that wasteful consumption can be curtailed simply by making it so no one has to "work for a living" unless one really wants to. Just think of all the energy spent (and commuting to and from) unnecessary work at a job you hate, to buy stuff you don't need, to impress people you don't even like. A UBI could thus greatly reduce our carbon and overall ecological footprint in the long run. As Marco Fioretti notes, the laws of physics ultimately demand UBI from a limits-to-growth perspective.
- According to the ever-insightful Marco Fioretti, UBI is essentially the logical conclusion of Catholic Social Doctrine. And at the same time, the ever-insightful Rodger Malcolm Mitchell also makes some great arguments from a more secular perspective as well.
- As sociology professor Jessica Calarco notes, neoliberalism has broken the social safety net, forced and conditioned society to accept precarity, and made Women bear the brunt of that precarity via their often invisible labor in place of the social safety net. And I believe that is yet another argument for UBI.
- And finally, one should keep in mind that, as Carol Brouillet has noted, the literal and original meaning of the word "community" is "free sharing of gifts". What we currently have now under patriarchy/kyriarchy is more of a pseudo-community in that regard. And that needs to change. Yesterday. The exchange economy of capitalist patriarchy has failed us, and we need to rediscover and re-create the gift economy in its place. A UBI will make the transition much smoother and more peaceful that it would otherwise be. (Some ultra-purist radfems may disagree of course, but they are in the minority even among the radical feminist community.)
In other words, it would be a win-win-win situation for literally everyone but the 0.01% oligarchs at the top. So why aren't we doing this yesterday? Because that would make far too much sense. To quote Buckminster Fuller:
We should do away with the absolutely specious notion that everybody has to earn a living. It is a fact today that one in ten thousand of us can make a technological breakthrough capable of supporting all the rest. The youth of today are absolutely right in recognizing this nonsense of earning a living. We keep inventing jobs because of this false idea that everybody has to be employed at some kind of drudgery because, according to Malthusian Darwinian theory he must justify his right to exist. So we have inspectors of inspectors and people making instruments for inspectors to inspect inspectors. The true business of people should be to go back to school and think about whatever it was they were thinking about before somebody came along and told them they had to earn a living.In fact, one could argue that two of the most toxic, outdated, and specious ideas ever conceived by the patriarchy (aside from the central doctrine of male supremacy itself and the entire "dominator" model, of course) are that "everybody and their mother must work for a living" and that "everybody must procreate." And both are now literally KILLING this very planet that gives us life. Thus, on balance, a Universal Basic Income Guarantee for all is a good idea regardless. Again, it's a win-win-win situation for everyone but the oligarchs. And the only real arguments against it are paternalistic and/or sadistic ones, which really means there are no good arguments against it in a free and civilized society.
Monday, September 2, 2024
Back By Popular Demand, The Legendary Guru Rasa Von Werder Has New Videos Again
Back by popular demand, the legendary Guru Rasa Von Werder has new videos again:
And there are more new videos where that came from, so be sure to check those out too!
Saturday, August 3, 2024
ICYMI, Guru Rasa Von Werder Has New Videos
ICYMI, the legendary Guru Rasa Von Werder's long-running YouTube Channel, now called "Guru Rasa Von Werder: New Religion 4 Women", has many new videos, including ones of her appearing in person.
https://youtube.com/@gururasavonwerder?si=gUSOz2PfqSxzBDoG
Be sure to check it out!
Tuesday, July 23, 2024
An Open Letter To Women In Politics
(Updated for 2024 America)
To any Women who are running for office, in office, or considering running for office in the near future:
You have probably noticed that the world is on fire, and has been for quite some time now. We stand on the verge of World War III as we speak, and our overburdened planet is in grave danger. We continue to flirt with the prospect of mass extinction (including humans, by the way) in the not-too-distant future, as we continue to cook the planet with reckless abandon. We know what is causing all of these problems, and we already have the technology and wherewithal to solve them if we really wanted to, yet our current Big Wetiko "leaders" refuse to solve such problems because they are sycophantic lackeys to the parasitic elites, if not the very same elites themselves. And these plutocrats are hopelesly addicted to "business as usual".
So how did we get here in the first place, exactly? The answer lies in ancient history, about 7000 years ago or so, when men apparently got the bright idea to take over the (known) world piece by piece, by deposing you from power. That's right, it was originally Women who were in charge for most of humanity's existence, and us fellas apparently thought we could do a better job as leaders than you ladies did. Well, history shows us that we were wrong--dead wrong in fact. Indeed, the best advice that us men can give to Women is "don't be like us", because we f**ked the world up royally. We paved paradise and put up a parking lot, we created a desert and called it "peace". We have devoured and suffocated our own empire, and now we are all paying a heavy price for it. That's right--WE did it. And we're sorry about that--though we can clearly stuff our "sorrys" in a sack!
Oh, and to top it off, us fellas decided to hit America's self-destruct button and vote overwhelmingly for Donald Trump for President in 2016. Yes, really. Because apparently we couldn't screw things up enough already. Fortunately, thank Goddess, the damage was limited. But if he wins again in 2024, we may not be so lucky this time.
And now it is time for you to reclaim your rightful position as the new leaders of the free world once again, starting with the USA and eventually spreading from there. In fact, it is LONG overdue for you to do so. We cannot apologize enough for handing you such a monumental clusterf**k of a world for you to fix, of course, but we fellas have plenty of faith that you will be able to do so. We know that Women, not men, are the real natural-born leaders, and you can clearly handle power a lot better without it going to your heads than us. We know that your preferred paradigm of society, what Riane Eisler calls the "partnership" model, is far better than the "dominator" model that we have been practicing for the past 7000 years. As the saying goes, never send a boy to do a man's job--send a Woman instead. Truer words were never spoken, and we need you now more than ever before.
The highest and tallest "glass ceiling" in the world--President of the United States--is still waiting to be smashed in 2024, as are plenty of other important political offices as well. Even though Hillary already did that with the popular vote in 2016, the Rube Goldberg machine known as the Electoral College was systematically rigged against her. But Goddess willing, Kamala Harris will win in 2024. We wish all of you the very best of luck. Now, go forth and make old Buckminster Fuller proud! Vive la femme!
Sincerely,
Ajax the Great (Pete Jackson)