There has been a lot of controversy lately about the so-called "Nordic Model" of in terms of sex work. For those who don't know, the Nordic Model refers to the policy in Sweden, Norway, and Iceland (and now Canada and France as well) of decriminalizing the sex workers themselves but criminalizing the buyers. Having been on the proverbial back-burner for years, the issue has recently been the subject of much political discourse after Amnesty International controversially came out in favor of full decriminalization (for both buyers and sellers) of sex work in 2015. Two recent op-eds, both of which in favor of the Nordic Model (and thus against Amnesty's new stance), have been written about the policy, one by former President Jimmy Carter and one by author and prostitution survivor Rachel Moran. And truth be told, both authors make some very good and insightful points that are very difficult to dismiss or ignore outright, especially when looking at international and before-and-after comparisons under various policy changes.
While the Nordic Model is clearly a step-up from the worst-of-both-worlds American Model (i.e. criminalize everyone involved, often going easier on the buyers than the sex workers themselves), one should note that it still leaves an awful lot to be desired. While it gets some things right, it also gets some things wrong--the biggie being something that practically all sides of the debate also get wrong. And no, it's not just that it's supposed success has been recently called into question--though that is also true. Nor is it the idea that it is relatively agency-denying to Women--though that is also true. Nor is it the idea that the Nordic Model can sometimes hurt those it is supposed to help--though that is also true. Nope, it's something far more fundamental about the nature of sex and sex work--so what is it?
Basically, there is a set of fundamental truths that have always existed and always will: 1) As Guru Rasa von Werder has repeatedly noted, prostitution is but one of many forms of "selling sex"--in fact, the most common form generally goes by the name of "marriage", 2) Sex work has existed even when Women used to rule the world, and will continue after Women reclaim their rightful position as the new leaders of the free world once again, 3) When Women are in charge of the profession, it becomes radically different than it is with men in charge, 4) Beggar-thy-neighbour policies to artificially inflate the relative "cost" of sex for men are notorious for backfiring, 5) There has never been a society in which Women had sexual freedom but men did not. The reverse has been true, of course, and there have been many societies where both or neither were sexually free, but trying to do the former would not last long since a black market for sex (paid or otherwise) would quickly develop. That's the grain of truth to the otherwise-bogus "race to the bottom" argument, and 6) Punishing anyone for sex between consenting adults, paid or otherwise, is really a backwards and illiberal idea when you think about it.
True, the sex industry is notorious for great evils, especially human trafficking. No argument from me there. But we need to get to the root causes of such evils--and those root causes are (surprise, surprise) capitalism and patriarchy. From the desperation that Women and children are driven to as a result of such systems, to the fact that men dominate the industry (and world), these are the real issues, and the evils of the industry are simply symptoms of such wholesale and systemic evil.
I personally believe that consenting-adult sex work should be completely decriminalized if not legalized, provided that only Women control it. Men have utterly ruined the "oldest profession" when they took it over. Otherwise, contrary to those who oppose it, sex work is not inherently evil or toxic to society. In fact, it can be quite healing and beneficial to society. So let the planetary healing begin!
No comments:
Post a Comment